XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: nuh-uh@nope.com   
      
   On 2026-01-16 20:46, Skeeter wrote:   
   > In article <10kf2gb$28hf2$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > uh@nope.com says...   
   >>   
   >> On 2026-01-16 19:44, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>> In article <10kes86$26qks$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>   
   >>>> On 2026-01-16 18:14, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>> In article <10keiop$23gth$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> On 2026-01-16 09:24, AlleyCat wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> ... and say this.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 14:34:23 -0800,  Alan says...   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Road?   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/OC9smu9.mp4   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/Lfbiqwg.jpeg   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> See those people standing thar, stoopit? WHAT are they standing on?   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Were any of those people in the direction she intended to travel?   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Sure they were.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> How do YOU know where Good was "intending to travel"?   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> You don't.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> I was making an illustrative point. YOU moved the goalposts, as usual,   
   with   
   >>>>>>> your fallacy of the specific.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> She could have gone down the street MADE A 3-POINT TURN and came back   
   at the   
   >>>>>>> officers, them, having to draw the weapons again and shoot her again.   
   >>>>>> So by pretending you know her intent was to run over an "officer"...   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Well you seem to be able to read minds you tell us.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> So when he states her intent he's NOT reading minds?   
   >>>   
   >>> BUTWHATABOUT!   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> ...you then pretend they need to protect against future "attacks".   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> She was turning away from the officer, doofus.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> On a one way street on a very icy road. No telling what   
   >>>>> could happen.   
   >>>> Actually there is "telling" that the car could not have gone to its left   
   >>>> with the wheels turned right.   
   >>>   
   >>> But it went straight.   
   >>   
   >> No, it most certainly did not. COULD not have with the wheels turned all   
   >> the way to the right.   
   >   
   > But it did. Ice is crazy stuff.   
      
   Ice cannot make a car with driven wheels turned to the right move   
   straight ahead from a stop.   
      
   Basic physics, doofus.   
      
   >>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> And regardless, it shows her intent.   
   >>>   
   >>> Which was to make a U Turn on a one way street and ICE   
   >>> just happened to be there. Yea that will sell a jury.   
   >> I suspect the reason she wanted to turn around was that ICE was present   
   >> and she wanted to get out of there.   
   >   
   > She was there because she knew who they were. That is   
   > settled.   
      
   By what source?   
      
   > Why didn't she just keep going?   
   The street was being occupied by ICE agents.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)