XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: nuh-uh@nope.com   
      
   On 2026-01-17 15:13, Skeeter wrote:   
   > In article <10kh3gs$2tn8q$10@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > uh@nope.com says...   
   >>   
   >> On 2026-01-15 16:36, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>>>>> It wasn't empty and if you call that a u turn then that   
   >>>>>>> explains why Canadians are such bad drivers.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> There was no "crowd" for her to have been aiming at.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Just that one agent.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Not in the direction she was intending to drive off he wasn't.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Why was she turning around in the mddle of the road?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Because she originally intended to go back the way she'd come...   
   >>>   
   >>> She couldn't just go around the block? Oh you're reading   
   >>> minds again?   
   >>   
   >> No. There was clearly an ICE operation going on in front of her and she   
   >> wanted to IMMEDIATELY go back the other way to avoid it.   
   >   
   > Bull, her wife shows they knew where they were and why.   
      
   How is that?   
      
   >>   
   >> That meant turning around.   
   >   
   > On a one way street? Are you reading minds again? You know   
   > what she was thinking?   
   >>   
   >> Then she realize it was a one way street so she COULDN'T go back that way.   
   >   
   > She already knew it was a one way street.   
      
   Now you're a mindreader!   
      
   >>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> ...but realized that she couldn't.   
   >>>   
   >>> Not on a crowded road. Dumb bitch.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> The PP was alluding to "Other people in her path, you fucking moron."   
   >>>>>> ASIDE from that "agent".   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> No one else was in her path.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Exactly!   
   >>>   
   >>> So shut up about it then.   
   >>   
   >> I'm not the one who made up the bullshit that she need to be shot   
   >> because she might encounter someone in the street at some undetermined   
   >> time in the future, sunshine.   
   >   
   > No one did. You made that shit up.   
      
   That's precisely what the loser was suggesting:   
      
   The agent need to shoot her because she might have hit someone else at   
   some time in the undetermined future:   
      
      
   >>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> There were no such others for whom the "agent" could have been acting in   
   >>>>>> defense.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Just for himself.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Which ended once he was beside the vehicle not in front of it.   
   >>>   
   >>> So? He was still doing the right thing. Get over it.   
   >>   
   >> No. He absolutely was not. By the policies of his agency he was not.   
   >   
   > Fuck policies. Self defense.   
      
   The policy says it isn't self-defense if he could have gotten out of the   
   way...   
      
   ...which he absolutely could have with a single step.   
      
   >>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> 6. Recent Surge in Attacks on Law Enforcement (2025)   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> A Department of Homeland Security (DHS) report released in late 2025   
   >>>>>>>>> highlighted a 1,300% increase in vehicle attacks specifically   
   targeting ICE   
   >>>>>>>>> officers.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Homestead, FL (Sept 2024): A driver reversed his car into an ICE   
   officer   
   >>>>>>>>> during a traffic stop, nearly crushing him, before ramming multiple   
   vehicles   
   >>>>>>>>> to escape.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Chicago, IL (Oct 2024): A suspect rammed CBP vehicles and attempted   
   to flee   
   >>>>>>>>> before being stopped by a PIT maneuver.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> This wasn't an "attack". This was a woman in the middle of a 3-point   
   >>>>>>>> turn who was startled when a masked man came up and grabbed her door.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> You said it was a U turn? So you really don't know.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> I really do know, because I've watched the videos.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> So was it a U Turn or a 3 point turn? Why was she doing it   
   >>>>> there? Why didn't she she drive forward?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> I think it was because she started to turn around to go back the way   
   >>>> she'd come, before realizing it was a one way street, and she had to   
   >>>> then change back to facing the correct way.   
   >>>   
   >>> "you think" therein lies the problem. She should have   
   >>> already known it was a one way street.   
   >>   
   >> People in stressful situations make mistakes.   
   >   
   > She made it stressful by being there.   
      
   She drove up a road and found an ICE operation.   
      
   These days, that's stressful for people.   
      
   >>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> She knew exactly who he was. Why did you ignore the video   
   >>>>>>> of her "wife" taunting the agents and telling her to   
   >>>>>>> "drive baby drive"?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> How is it relevant?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> In court it will be.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Nope.   
   >>>   
   >>> More proof you know nothing about how it works.   
   >>   
   >> LOL!   
   >   
   > His white flag.   
      
   LOL!   
      
      
   >>   
   >>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> And still: the "officer" who you claim was hit could have avoided even   
   >>>>>>>> the chance of contact by stepping to the right once.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> She could still be alive if she didn't try ti interfere   
   >>>>>>> with Federal Law Enforcement.   
   >>>>>> There is no evidence that she did so.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Plenty. The video of her bitch wife shows it.   
   >>>> The video OF the wife...   
   >>>>   
   >>>> ...or the video TAKEN by the wife...   
   >>>>   
   >>>> ...and what does it show?   
   >>>   
   >>> Intent and the fact that they did know who the agents   
   >>> were.   
   >>   
   >> Which has nothing to do with whether she intended to hit the agent...   
   >   
   > It sure knocks a lot of your lies apart.   
      
   What "lies" would those be?   
      
   >>   
   >> ...because her actions clearly don't match that intent.   
   >   
   > So the wife didn't know what she was dong?   
      
   Explain how it's relevant.   
      
   >>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> How does waving a vehicle through square with your claim she was   
   >>>> "interfering"?   
   >>>   
   >>> You saw the video or did you ignore it?   
   >> Answer the question.   
   Show me the video you claim shows she was "interfering".   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)