home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   can.politics      Libs bitching about what they voted for      997,123 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 996,327 of 997,123   
   Socialism is for losers to Alan   
   Re: Poor Little Rich Kid... So Desperate   
   17 Jan 26 18:54:29   
   
   XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: MeanDog@Snarl.Dash   
      
   On Sat, 17 Jan 2026 14:03:41 -0800, Alan  wrote:   
      
   >On 2026-01-17 00:30, Socialism is for losers wrote:   
   >   
   >>>>>>>>>> who weaponize her car.   
   >>>>>>>>> Who was just trying to leave the area.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> By stomping on the gas with a man standing in front of her car?   
   >>>>>>> By turning her wheel all the way to her right and assuming that a man   
   >>>>>>> who had been walking to her left would continue to walk left.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> And there was no "stomping".   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> The car sure jerked ahead as it hit him.   
   >>>>> Nope. The "officer" might have jerked, but there is video taken from   
   >>>>> outside the car and it moved off in a completely ordinary manner.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> It jerked.   
   >>>   
   >>> The officer seems to have jerked in his cellphone video...   
   >>>   
   >>> ...but that doesn't prove that he was struck.   
   >>   
   >> The other videos show he was hit.   
   >   
   >No video shows it. Not one.   
   >   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>> Moving himself quickly out of the way could produce such a jerk.   
   >>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> And you haven't addressed that she was clearly steering away from him..   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Well she's a shitty driver then. Besides she was making a   
   >>>> u turn on a one way street. You defended her by saying she   
   >>>> didn't know it was a one way street. So not only is she a   
   >>>> shitty driver she shouldn't even be driving at all.   
   >>>   
   >>> None of that changes that she was steering away from him.   
   >>   
   >> She still hit him   
   >   
   >That is, as yet, unproven.   
   >   
   >>   
   >>>>> ...which she wouldn't have been doing if she was "weaponizing her car".   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Oh you read her mind? How many time have you personally   
   >>>> been in the same situation? Never? Then STFU.   
   >>> If her intent was to hit him, she chose a course of action that   
   >>> absolutely minimized the chance.   
   >Got no answer for that part, huh?   
      
   It doesn't matter. She knew he was in frront of her car and she drove   
   in such a manner as to hit him.   
      
   --   
   Only losers want Socialism or Communism.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca