XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: MeanDog@Snarl.Dash   
      
   On Sat, 17 Jan 2026 14:20:48 -0800, Alan  wrote:   
      
   >On 2026-01-17 00:26, Socialism is for losers wrote:   
   >> On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 17:06:56 -0800, Alan  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On 2026-01-16 16:43, Socialism is for losers wrote:   
   >>>> On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 16:35:41 -0800, Alan  wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> On 2026-01-16 15:53, Socialism is for losers wrote:   
   >>>>>> On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 15:43:39 -0800, Alan  wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 09:25, AlleyCat wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 15:17:39 -0800,  Alan says...   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> I was in the Queen's York Rangers.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Uhhh... NO ONE gives a shit.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Had a lot of people trying to run you over in cars, did you?   
   >>>>>>> Nope. But she wasn't trying to run him over.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> She wouldn't have turned the wheel all the way to the right if she was.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> You think you could read her mind?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> The only available facts are that she hit him and he killed her.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> I can read the fact that a man was walking to her left and she was   
   >>>>> steering to the right. Those are facts too.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> He was not walking when she hit him.   
   >>> That's my point: he stopped.   
   >>>   
   >>> When all the use of force policies explicitly state you shouldn't stop   
   >>> in front of a vehicle...   
   >>>   
   >>> ...he stopped.   
   >>   
   >> and she hit him.   
   >   
   >That remains unproven.   
   >   
   >But stopping was specifically called out in the use of force policies as   
   >something he SHOULD NOT DO, and also that using deadly force against a   
   >vehicle is only permissible when the agent cannot avoid being hit...   
   >   
   >...which he could have by taking one more step.   
      
   She knew he was in frront of her car and she drove in such a manner   
    as to hit him.   
      
   >Customs and Border Patrol were called out in a 2013 report specifically   
   >for stopping in front of vehicles and then using that as a justification   
   >for shooting people.   
   >   
   >>   
   >>> One more step to his right / her left and he is completely clear of any   
   >>> possible conflict.   
   >>   
   >> Had she obeyed the commands she would still be alive.   
   >There was no command to stop.   
      
   --   
   Only losers want Socialism or Communism.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)