XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: invalid@none.com   
      
   In article <10kh3jg$2tnfv$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   uh@nope.com says...   
   >   
   > On 2026-01-16 20:46, Skeeter wrote:   
   > > In article <10kf2gb$28hf2$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > > uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>   
   > >> On 2026-01-16 19:44, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>> In article <10kes86$26qks$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > >>> uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> On 2026-01-16 18:14, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>>>> In article <10keiop$23gth$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > >>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> On 2026-01-16 09:24, AlleyCat wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> ... and say this.   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 14:34:23 -0800,  Alan says...   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> Road?   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/OC9smu9.mp4   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/Lfbiqwg.jpeg   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> See those people standing thar, stoopit? WHAT are they standing on?   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> Were any of those people in the direction she intended to travel?   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> Sure they were.   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> How do YOU know where Good was "intending to travel"?   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> You don't.   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> I was making an illustrative point. YOU moved the goalposts, as   
   usual, with   
   > >>>>>>> your fallacy of the specific.   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> She could have gone down the street MADE A 3-POINT TURN and came   
   back at the   
   > >>>>>>> officers, them, having to draw the weapons again and shoot her again.   
   > >>>>>> So by pretending you know her intent was to run over an "officer"...   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> Well you seem to be able to read minds you tell us.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> So when he states her intent he's NOT reading minds?   
   > >>>   
   > >>> BUTWHATABOUT!   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> ...you then pretend they need to protect against future "attacks".   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> She was turning away from the officer, doofus.   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> On a one way street on a very icy road. No telling what   
   > >>>>> could happen.   
   > >>>> Actually there is "telling" that the car could not have gone to its left   
   > >>>> with the wheels turned right.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> But it went straight.   
   > >>   
   > >> No, it most certainly did not. COULD not have with the wheels turned all   
   > >> the way to the right.   
   > >   
   > > But it did. Ice is crazy stuff.   
   >   
   > Ice cannot make a car with driven wheels turned to the right move   
   > straight ahead from a stop.   
      
   You never drove on ice.   
   >   
   > Basic physics, doofus.   
      
   Why can't we reach absolute zero? Basic physics idiot.   
   >   
   > >>   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> And regardless, it shows her intent.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> Which was to make a U Turn on a one way street and ICE   
   > >>> just happened to be there. Yea that will sell a jury.   
   > >> I suspect the reason she wanted to turn around was that ICE was present   
   > >> and she wanted to get out of there.   
   > >   
   > > She was there because she knew who they were. That is   
   > > settled.   
   >   
   > By what source?   
      
   By the fact they had uniforms and shit. You really are   
   this stupid.   
   >   
   > > Why didn't she just keep going?   
   > The street was being occupied by ICE agents.   
      
   Nope, she could have gone on. She knew the agents were   
   there so why did she go anyway?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)