XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: invalid@none.com   
      
   In article <10kh2io$2tn8q$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   uh@nope.com says...   
   >   
   > On 2026-01-16 20:31, Skeeter wrote:   
   > > In article <10kf2eh$28hf2$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > > uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>   
   > >> On 2026-01-16 19:44, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>> In article <10kerg2$268b0$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > >>> uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> On 2026-01-16 18:03, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>>>> In article <10keh5c$23gue$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > >>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> On 2026-01-16 14:25, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>>>>>> In article <10ke30v$1ui33$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > >>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 04:30, NoBody wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> 3. Authorized Officers/Agents should avoid intentionally and   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> unreasonably placing themselves in positions in which they have   
   no   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> alternative to using deadly force.'   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> He did.  SHE changed that equation.   
   > >>>>>>>>>> He chose to remain there when a single step to his right would   
   have   
   > >>>>>>>>>> taken him out of the danger area.   
   > >>>>>>>>> Laughter!   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> I love how you pretend to be an armchair expert on what could or   
   could   
   > >>>>>>>>> not have been done.  She weaponized her vehicle and he perceived a   
   > >>>>>>>>> threat to his life and safety.  Legit shoot.   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> If she'd intended to drive into him, she wouldn't have been turning   
   her   
   > >>>>>>>> steering wheel hard to the right...   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> ...and therefore AWAY from him.   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> She saw a man moving across from her right to left, and how was she   
   to   
   > >>>>>>>> know he'd stop moving?   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> She knew exactly who he was. Stop playing stupid. Idiots   
   > >>>>>>> like you trying to say "she had no idea who he was" yet he   
   > >>>>>>> was wearing a uniform and her bitch wife was running   
   > >>>>>>> around taunting them So that lie is debunked.   
   > >>>>>> The point you missed was that he was MOVING, and if he KEPT moving, he   
   > >>>>>> would have been out of the way.   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> I was using "man" in the generic sense, not to suggest she didn't know   
   > >>>>>> he was with ICE.   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> Oh she knew.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> I know that.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> I was never trying to deny it.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> You tried and failed. He was wearing an ICE uniform fer   
   > >>> crissakes.   
   > >>   
   > >> My POINT at the time was that the driver saw SOMEONE moving to her left   
   > >> when she was intending to go right. It doesn't matter WHO that someone   
   was.   
   > >   
   > > It dod to her.   
   >   
   > Nope. Not regarding the question of her intent.   
      
   Her intent was to agitate ICE agents.   
   >   
   > >>   
   > >> The normal and logical conclusion of someone moving to your left while   
   > >> you're trying to go right is that they intend to get out of your way.   
   > >   
   > > Won't work in court. Try harder.   
   > Intent can be inferred from action.   
      
   It will be important in court at least to a fair judge and   
   jury.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)