XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: nuh-uh@nope.com   
      
   On 2026-01-17 15:58, Skeeter wrote:   
   > In article <10kh3jg$2tnfv$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > uh@nope.com says...   
   >>   
   >> On 2026-01-16 20:46, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>> In article <10kf2gb$28hf2$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>   
   >>>> On 2026-01-16 19:44, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>> In article <10kes86$26qks$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> On 2026-01-16 18:14, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>>>> In article <10keiop$23gth$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 09:24, AlleyCat wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> ... and say this.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 14:34:23 -0800,  Alan says...   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Road?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/OC9smu9.mp4   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/Lfbiqwg.jpeg   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> See those people standing thar, stoopit? WHAT are they standing on?   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Were any of those people in the direction she intended to travel?   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Sure they were.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> How do YOU know where Good was "intending to travel"?   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> You don't.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> I was making an illustrative point. YOU moved the goalposts, as   
   usual, with   
   >>>>>>>>> your fallacy of the specific.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> She could have gone down the street MADE A 3-POINT TURN and came   
   back at the   
   >>>>>>>>> officers, them, having to draw the weapons again and shoot her again.   
   >>>>>>>> So by pretending you know her intent was to run over an "officer"...   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Well you seem to be able to read minds you tell us.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> So when he states her intent he's NOT reading minds?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> BUTWHATABOUT!   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> ...you then pretend they need to protect against future "attacks".   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> She was turning away from the officer, doofus.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> On a one way street on a very icy road. No telling what   
   >>>>>>> could happen.   
   >>>>>> Actually there is "telling" that the car could not have gone to its left   
   >>>>>> with the wheels turned right.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> But it went straight.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> No, it most certainly did not. COULD not have with the wheels turned all   
   >>>> the way to the right.   
   >>>   
   >>> But it did. Ice is crazy stuff.   
   >>   
   >> Ice cannot make a car with driven wheels turned to the right move   
   >> straight ahead from a stop.   
   >   
   > You never drove on ice.   
      
   I've driven on ice since I learned  to drive.   
      
   >>   
   >> Basic physics, doofus.   
   >   
   > Why can't we reach absolute zero? Basic physics idiot.   
   Utterly irrelevant and a lame deflection.   
      
   Draw a free body diagram that shows the forces that would cause the   
   vehicle to move forward when the driven wheels are steered to the right.   
      
   To you even know what a "free body diagram" is?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)