XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump
From: nuh-uh@nope.com
On 2026-01-17 16:08, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <10kh0q6$2tajo$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> uh@nope.com says...
>>
>> On 2026-01-16 21:04, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <10kf3ae$28hf2$10@dont-email.me>, nuh-
>>> uh@nope.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 2026-01-16 20:17, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>> In article <10kettc$27aph$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-
>>>>> uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 18:46, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <10kej2r$23gth$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-
>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 06:58, Socialism is for losers wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 22:12:18 -0800, Alan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-15 21:56, Socialism is for losers wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 03:14:15 +0000, Mitchell Holman
noemail@aol.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Skeeter wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>> news:MPG.43d32e5ab2984fa998ab8b@usnews.blocknews.net:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <10kbt0p$15km6$12@dont-email.me>, nuh-
>>>>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-14 22:07, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article ,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> noemail@aol.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Skeeter wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:MPG.43d1df313a3f71e98ab02@usnews.blocknews.net:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <10k96l8$8549$14@dont-email.me>, nuh-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-12 09:39, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 11 Jan 2026 23:16:44 -0800, Alan says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Both criminals.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You aren't allowed to shoot at someone when they aren't a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> threat.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Correct... I guess.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But, no. (see bottom)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Even if his first shot was when he was near the front of
the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vehicle, his next two were from directly beside the
driver's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> door, and it was turning AWAY from him.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And I've explained this, moron.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Law enforcement, after having been run over, plowed down,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> assaulted with a deadly weapon, vehicularly (Y, IK)
assaulted,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or any other term you might want to use
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> here, usually shoot until the perpetrator is incapacitated
or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> out of range, to keep the driver from doing any more harm
to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> others or even themselves.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Except this officer was not "run over" OR "plowed down".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But he was hit.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A threat is not "over" just because the vehicle has
cleared the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> officer's path.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, actually it is.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who says? You? LOL
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If Good has already demonstrated her intent (which the
officers
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> did not KNOW) to use a vehicle as a weapon, they remain a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'deadly threat" until they are stopped. Turning "away"
could
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> simply be a maneuver to reposition for another strike or to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flee at high speeds, endangering the public.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Her obvious intent was to leave the area and an officer
with no
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> authority grabbed at her door, escalating the situation.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No authority? He's a law officer you moron.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So were the Capitol Police that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump (and you) want to prosecute.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Like the one that murdered Ashley?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> She was breaking into a secure area and posed an immediate
threat to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those the police were defending behind that door.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> They had guns and she didn't.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Just like Renee Good.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> who weaponize her car.
>>>>>>>>>> Who was just trying to leave the area.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> By stomping on the gas with a man standing in front of her car?
>>>>>>>> By turning her wheel all the way to her right and assuming that a man
>>>>>>>> who had been walking to her left would continue to walk left.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And there was no "stomping".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Her tires were spinning on the ice.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> OK... ...but that means she would be moving even MORE slowly.
>>>>>
>>>>> Until they grabbed. Obviously you don't drive in the
>>>>> winter much.
>>>>
>>>> I'm an excellent winter driver, but that time when they were spinning
>>>> would have made it absolutely clear to the "agent" that the vehicle was
>>>> about to move.
>>>
>>> Shit happens fast.
>>
>> And still, if he hadn't stopped in front of her, he'd never have been hit.
>
> If she would have followed orders she wouldn't have been
> hit.
Irrelevant.
He deliberately stopped in front of a vehicle that he KNEW was about to
move...
...and that was a complete violation of his agency's policies
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
