XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: invalid@none.com   
      
   In article <10kh5an$2tnfv$10@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   uh@nope.com says...   
   >   
   > On 2026-01-17 15:13, Skeeter wrote:   
   > > In article <10kh3gs$2tn8q$10@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > > uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>   
   > >> On 2026-01-15 16:36, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>   
   > >>>>>>> It wasn't empty and if you call that a u turn then that   
   > >>>>>>> explains why Canadians are such bad drivers.   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> There was no "crowd" for her to have been aiming at.   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> Just that one agent.   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> Not in the direction she was intending to drive off he wasn't.   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> Why was she turning around in the mddle of the road?   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> Because she originally intended to go back the way she'd come...   
   > >>>   
   > >>> She couldn't just go around the block? Oh you're reading   
   > >>> minds again?   
   > >>   
   > >> No. There was clearly an ICE operation going on in front of her and she   
   > >> wanted to IMMEDIATELY go back the other way to avoid it.   
   > >   
   > > Bull, her wife shows they knew where they were and why.   
   >   
   > How is that?   
      
   You deny what was in the video.   
   >   
   > >>   
   > >> That meant turning around.   
   > >   
   > > On a one way street? Are you reading minds again? You know   
   > > what she was thinking?   
   > >>   
   > >> Then she realize it was a one way street so she COULDN'T go back that way.   
   > >   
   > > She already knew it was a one way street.   
   >   
   > Now you're a mindreader!   
      
   If she didn't then she shouldn't be driving.   
   >   
   > >>   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> ...but realized that she couldn't.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> Not on a crowded road. Dumb bitch.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> The PP was alluding to "Other people in her path, you fucking moron."   
   > >>>>>> ASIDE from that "agent".   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> No one else was in her path.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> Exactly!   
   > >>>   
   > >>> So shut up about it then.   
   > >>   
   > >> I'm not the one who made up the bullshit that she need to be shot   
   > >> because she might encounter someone in the street at some undetermined   
   > >> time in the future, sunshine.   
   > >   
   > > No one did. You made that shit up.   
   >   
   > That's precisely what the loser was suggesting:   
      
   Nope.   
   >   
   > The agent need to shoot her because she might have hit someone else at   
   > some time in the undetermined future:   
      
   Nope. That's your take.   
   >   
   >   
   > >>   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> There were no such others for whom the "agent" could have been acting   
   in   
   > >>>>>> defense.   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> Just for himself.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> Which ended once he was beside the vehicle not in front of it.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> So? He was still doing the right thing. Get over it.   
   > >>   
   > >> No. He absolutely was not. By the policies of his agency he was not.   
   > >   
   > > Fuck policies. Self defense.   
   >   
   > The policy says it isn't self-defense if he could have gotten out of the   
   > way...   
   >   
      
   POLICY!   
      
      
   > ...which he absolutely could have with a single step.   
      
   You weren't there.   
   >   
   > >>   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> 6. Recent Surge in Attacks on Law Enforcement (2025)   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> A Department of Homeland Security (DHS) report released in late   
   2025   
   > >>>>>>>>> highlighted a 1,300% increase in vehicle attacks specifically   
   targeting ICE   
   > >>>>>>>>> officers.   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> Homestead, FL (Sept 2024): A driver reversed his car into an ICE   
   officer   
   > >>>>>>>>> during a traffic stop, nearly crushing him, before ramming   
   multiple vehicles   
   > >>>>>>>>> to escape.   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> Chicago, IL (Oct 2024): A suspect rammed CBP vehicles and   
   attempted to flee   
   > >>>>>>>>> before being stopped by a PIT maneuver.   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> This wasn't an "attack". This was a woman in the middle of a 3-point   
   > >>>>>>>> turn who was startled when a masked man came up and grabbed her   
   door.   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> You said it was a U turn? So you really don't know.   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> I really do know, because I've watched the videos.   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> So was it a U Turn or a 3 point turn? Why was she doing it   
   > >>>>> there? Why didn't she she drive forward?   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> I think it was because she started to turn around to go back the way   
   > >>>> she'd come, before realizing it was a one way street, and she had to   
   > >>>> then change back to facing the correct way.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> "you think" therein lies the problem. She should have   
   > >>> already known it was a one way street.   
   > >>   
   > >> People in stressful situations make mistakes.   
   > >   
   > > She made it stressful by being there.   
   >   
   > She drove up a road and found an ICE operation.   
      
   She knew it was there.   
   >   
   > These days, that's stressful for people.   
      
   Not to people who are paid to agitate.   
   >   
   > >>   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> She knew exactly who he was. Why did you ignore the video   
   > >>>>>>> of her "wife" taunting the agents and telling her to   
   > >>>>>>> "drive baby drive"?   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> How is it relevant?   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> In court it will be.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> Nope.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> More proof you know nothing about how it works.   
   > >>   
   > >> LOL!   
   > >   
   > > His white flag.   
   >   
   > LOL!   
      
   He flaps it again.   
   >   
   >   
   > >>   
   > >>   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> And still: the "officer" who you claim was hit could have avoided   
   even   
   > >>>>>>>> the chance of contact by stepping to the right once.   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> She could still be alive if she didn't try ti interfere   
   > >>>>>>> with Federal Law Enforcement.   
   > >>>>>> There is no evidence that she did so.   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> Plenty. The video of her bitch wife shows it.   
   > >>>> The video OF the wife...   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> ...or the video TAKEN by the wife...   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> ...and what does it show?   
   > >>>   
   > >>> Intent and the fact that they did know who the agents   
   > >>> were.   
   > >>   
   > >> Which has nothing to do with whether she intended to hit the agent...   
   > >   
   > > It sure knocks a lot of your lies apart.   
   >   
   > What "lies" would those be?   
      
   You have contradicted yourself a bunch in the last couple   
   days.   
   >   
   > >>   
   > >> ...because her actions clearly don't match that intent.   
   > >   
   > > So the wife didn't know what she was dong?   
   >   
   > Explain how it's relevant.   
      
   It prove they knew who the agents were and that they were   
   there to agitate.   
   >   
   > >>   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> How does waving a vehicle through square with your claim she was   
   > >>>> "interfering"?   
   > >>>   
   > >>> You saw the video or did you ignore it?   
   > >> Answer the question.   
   > Show me the video you claim shows she was "interfering".   
      
   I never said she was interfering you moron.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)