XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump
From: invalid@none.com
In article <10khffl$2tnfv$15@dont-email.me>, nuh-
uh@nope.com says...
>
> On 2026-01-17 16:08, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <10kh0q6$2tajo$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> > uh@nope.com says...
> >>
> >> On 2026-01-16 21:04, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <10kf3ae$28hf2$10@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> >>> uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2026-01-16 20:17, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>> In article <10kettc$27aph$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> >>>>> uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 2026-01-16 18:46, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>> In article <10kej2r$23gth$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> >>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 06:58, Socialism is for losers wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 22:12:18 -0800, Alan wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-15 21:56, Socialism is for losers wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 03:14:15 +0000, Mitchell Holman
> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Skeeter wrote in
> >>>>>>>>>>>> news:MPG.43d32e5ab2984fa998ab8b@usnews.blocknews.net:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <10kbt0p$15km6$12@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-14 22:07, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article ,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> noemail@aol.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Skeeter wrote in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:MPG.43d1df313a3f71e98ab02@usnews.blocknews.net:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <10k96l8$8549$14@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-12 09:39, AlleyCat wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 11 Jan 2026 23:16:44 -0800, Alan says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Both criminals.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You aren't allowed to shoot at someone when they aren't
a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> threat.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Correct... I guess.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But, no. (see bottom)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Even if his first shot was when he was near the front
of the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vehicle, his next two were from directly beside the
driver's
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> door, and it was turning AWAY from him.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And I've explained this, moron.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Law enforcement, after having been run over, plowed down,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> assaulted with a deadly weapon, vehicularly (Y, IK)
assaulted,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or any other term you might want to use
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> here, usually shoot until the perpetrator is
incapacitated or
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> out of range, to keep the driver from doing any more
harm to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> others or even themselves.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Except this officer was not "run over" OR "plowed down".
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But he was hit.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A threat is not "over" just because the vehicle has
cleared the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> officer's path.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, actually it is.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who says? You? LOL
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If Good has already demonstrated her intent (which the
officers
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> did not KNOW) to use a vehicle as a weapon, they remain a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'deadly threat" until they are stopped. Turning "away"
could
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> simply be a maneuver to reposition for another strike or
to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flee at high speeds, endangering the public.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Her obvious intent was to leave the area and an officer
with no
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> authority grabbed at her door, escalating the situation.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No authority? He's a law officer you moron.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So were the Capitol Police that
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump (and you) want to prosecute.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Like the one that murdered Ashley?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> She was breaking into a secure area and posed an immediate
threat to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> those the police were defending behind that door.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> They had guns and she didn't.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Just like Renee Good.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> who weaponize her car.
> >>>>>>>>>> Who was just trying to leave the area.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> By stomping on the gas with a man standing in front of her car?
> >>>>>>>> By turning her wheel all the way to her right and assuming that a
man
> >>>>>>>> who had been walking to her left would continue to walk left.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> And there was no "stomping".
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Her tires were spinning on the ice.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> OK... ...but that means she would be moving even MORE slowly.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Until they grabbed. Obviously you don't drive in the
> >>>>> winter much.
> >>>>
> >>>> I'm an excellent winter driver, but that time when they were spinning
> >>>> would have made it absolutely clear to the "agent" that the vehicle was
> >>>> about to move.
> >>>
> >>> Shit happens fast.
> >>
> >> And still, if he hadn't stopped in front of her, he'd never have been hit.
> >
> > If she would have followed orders she wouldn't have been
> > hit.
> Irrelevant.
>
> He deliberately stopped in front of a vehicle that he KNEW was about to
> move...
Mind reading again?
>
> ...and that was a complete violation of his agency's policies
POLICIES!
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
