XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: invalid@none.com   
      
   In article <10khfcc$2tnfv$14@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   uh@nope.com says...   
   >   
   > On 2026-01-17 15:58, Skeeter wrote:   
   > > In article <10kh3jg$2tnfv$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > > uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>   
   > >> On 2026-01-16 20:46, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>> In article <10kf2gb$28hf2$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > >>> uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> On 2026-01-16 19:44, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>>>> In article <10kes86$26qks$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > >>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> On 2026-01-16 18:14, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>>>>>> In article <10keiop$23gth$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > >>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 09:24, AlleyCat wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> ... and say this.   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 14:34:23 -0800,  Alan says...   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> Road?   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/OC9smu9.mp4   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/Lfbiqwg.jpeg   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> See those people standing thar, stoopit? WHAT are they standing   
   on?   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>> Were any of those people in the direction she intended to travel?   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> Sure they were.   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> How do YOU know where Good was "intending to travel"?   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> You don't.   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> I was making an illustrative point. YOU moved the goalposts, as   
   usual, with   
   > >>>>>>>>> your fallacy of the specific.   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> She could have gone down the street MADE A 3-POINT TURN and came   
   back at the   
   > >>>>>>>>> officers, them, having to draw the weapons again and shoot her   
   again.   
   > >>>>>>>> So by pretending you know her intent was to run over an "officer"...   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> Well you seem to be able to read minds you tell us.   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> So when he states her intent he's NOT reading minds?   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> BUTWHATABOUT!   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> ...you then pretend they need to protect against future "attacks".   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> She was turning away from the officer, doofus.   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> On a one way street on a very icy road. No telling what   
   > >>>>>>> could happen.   
   > >>>>>> Actually there is "telling" that the car could not have gone to its   
   left   
   > >>>>>> with the wheels turned right.   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> But it went straight.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> No, it most certainly did not. COULD not have with the wheels turned all   
   > >>>> the way to the right.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> But it did. Ice is crazy stuff.   
   > >>   
   > >> Ice cannot make a car with driven wheels turned to the right move   
   > >> straight ahead from a stop.   
   > >   
   > > You never drove on ice.   
   >   
   > I've driven on ice since I learned  to drive.   
      
   Liar.   
   >   
   > >>   
   > >> Basic physics, doofus.   
   > >   
   > > Why can't we reach absolute zero? Basic physics idiot.   
   > Utterly irrelevant and a lame deflection.   
      
   So you don't know basic physics.   
   >   
   > Draw a free body diagram that shows the forces that would cause the   
   > vehicle to move forward when the driven wheels are steered to the right.   
      
   Rear wheeled vehicles can do that.   
   >   
   > To you even know what a "free body diagram" is?   
      
   You had to Google it.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)