XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: nuh-uh@nope.com   
      
   On 2026-01-18 06:28, NoBody wrote:   
   > On Sat, 17 Jan 2026 14:26:50 -0800, Alan  wrote:   
   >   
   >> On 2026-01-17 06:40, NoBody wrote:   
   >>> On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 15:21:16 -0800, Alan  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On 2026-01-16 14:25, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>> In article <10ke30v$1ui33$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> On 2026-01-16 04:30, NoBody wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> 3. Authorized Officers/Agents should avoid intentionally and   
   >>>>>>>>>> unreasonably placing themselves in positions in which they have no   
   >>>>>>>>>> alternative to using deadly force.'   
   >>>>>>>>> He did.  SHE changed that equation.   
   >>>>>>>> He chose to remain there when a single step to his right would have   
   >>>>>>>> taken him out of the danger area.   
   >>>>>>> Laughter!   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> I love how you pretend to be an armchair expert on what could or could   
   >>>>>>> not have been done.  She weaponized her vehicle and he perceived a   
   >>>>>>> threat to his life and safety.  Legit shoot.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> If she'd intended to drive into him, she wouldn't have been turning her   
   >>>>>> steering wheel hard to the right...   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> ...and therefore AWAY from him.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> She saw a man moving across from her right to left, and how was she to   
   >>>>>> know he'd stop moving?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> She knew exactly who he was. Stop playing stupid. Idiots   
   >>>>> like you trying to say "she had no idea who he was" yet he   
   >>>>> was wearing a uniform and her bitch wife was running   
   >>>>> around taunting them So that lie is debunked.   
   >>>> The point you missed was that he was MOVING, and if he KEPT moving, he   
   >>>> would have been out of the way.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> I was using "man" in the generic sense, not to suggest she didn't know   
   >>>> he was with ICE.   
   >>>   
   >>> She had been following them all day....   
   >>   
   >> Really?   
   >>   
   >> And where did you learn that?   
   >>   
   >> Was it from the same people who at first told you that the agent had   
   >> been "run over"?   
   >   
   > First of all "run over" is a generalized term for being struck by a   
   > vehicle.   
      
   First, did you read what Trump wrote:   
      
   "who then violently, willfully, and viciously ran over the ICE Officer,"   
      
   He also stated:   
      
   "on the attached clip, it is hard to believe he is alive, but is now   
   recovering in the hospital"   
      
   And that, too, was false.   
      
      
   Second, no: it isn't.   
      
   >  In answer to your question, I allow for the possibility that   
   > she followed ICE all day might be erroneous.   
      
   And yet you stated it as an absolute fact until challenged.   
      
     I'm not finding any   
   > stories in my searches except for what the family claims which means   
   > we simply don't know.  I'm fine with retracting that claim if it makes   
   > you happy.   
      
   It's not so much about the claim, but rather your willingness to make it   
   in the first place.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)