XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: invalid@none.com   
      
   In article <10kjnl8$3qsla$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   uh@nope.com says...   
   >   
   > On 2026-01-18 06:28, NoBody wrote:   
   > > On Sat, 17 Jan 2026 14:26:50 -0800, Alan  wrote:   
   > >   
   > >> On 2026-01-17 06:40, NoBody wrote:   
   > >>> On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 15:21:16 -0800, Alan  wrote:   
   > >>>   
   > >>>> On 2026-01-16 14:25, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>>>> In article <10ke30v$1ui33$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > >>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> On 2026-01-16 04:30, NoBody wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>> 3. Authorized Officers/Agents should avoid intentionally and   
   > >>>>>>>>>> unreasonably placing themselves in positions in which they have no   
   > >>>>>>>>>> alternative to using deadly force.'   
   > >>>>>>>>> He did.  SHE changed that equation.   
   > >>>>>>>> He chose to remain there when a single step to his right would have   
   > >>>>>>>> taken him out of the danger area.   
   > >>>>>>> Laughter!   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> I love how you pretend to be an armchair expert on what could or   
   could   
   > >>>>>>> not have been done.  She weaponized her vehicle and he perceived a   
   > >>>>>>> threat to his life and safety.  Legit shoot.   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> If she'd intended to drive into him, she wouldn't have been turning   
   her   
   > >>>>>> steering wheel hard to the right...   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> ...and therefore AWAY from him.   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> She saw a man moving across from her right to left, and how was she to   
   > >>>>>> know he'd stop moving?   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> She knew exactly who he was. Stop playing stupid. Idiots   
   > >>>>> like you trying to say "she had no idea who he was" yet he   
   > >>>>> was wearing a uniform and her bitch wife was running   
   > >>>>> around taunting them So that lie is debunked.   
   > >>>> The point you missed was that he was MOVING, and if he KEPT moving, he   
   > >>>> would have been out of the way.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> I was using "man" in the generic sense, not to suggest she didn't know   
   > >>>> he was with ICE.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> She had been following them all day....   
   > >>   
   > >> Really?   
   > >>   
   > >> And where did you learn that?   
   > >>   
   > >> Was it from the same people who at first told you that the agent had   
   > >> been "run over"?   
   > >   
   > > First of all "run over" is a generalized term for being struck by a   
   > > vehicle.   
   >   
   > First, did you read what Trump wrote:   
   >   
   > "who then violently, willfully, and viciously ran over the ICE Officer,"   
   >   
   > He also stated:   
   >   
   > "on the attached clip, it is hard to believe he is alive, but is now   
   > recovering in the hospital"   
   >   
   > And that, too, was false.   
   >   
   >   
   > Second, no: it isn't.   
   >   
   > >  In answer to your question, I allow for the possibility that   
   > > she followed ICE all day might be erroneous.   
   >   
   > And yet you stated it as an absolute fact until challenged.   
   >   
   >   I'm not finding any   
   > > stories in my searches except for what the family claims which means   
   > > we simply don't know.  I'm fine with retracting that claim if it makes   
   > > you happy.   
   >   
   > It's not so much about the claim, but rather your willingness to make it   
   > in the first place.   
      
   The left lies all the time. What's your point?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)