XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: nuh-uh@nope.com   
      
   On 2026-01-18 14:58, Skeeter wrote:   
   > In article <10kjnl8$3qsla$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > uh@nope.com says...   
   >>   
   >> On 2026-01-18 06:28, NoBody wrote:   
   >>> On Sat, 17 Jan 2026 14:26:50 -0800, Alan  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On 2026-01-17 06:40, NoBody wrote:   
   >>>>> On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 15:21:16 -0800, Alan  wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> On 2026-01-16 14:25, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>>>> In article <10ke30v$1ui33$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 04:30, NoBody wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> 3. Authorized Officers/Agents should avoid intentionally and   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> unreasonably placing themselves in positions in which they have no   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> alternative to using deadly force.'   
   >>>>>>>>>>> He did.  SHE changed that equation.   
   >>>>>>>>>> He chose to remain there when a single step to his right would have   
   >>>>>>>>>> taken him out of the danger area.   
   >>>>>>>>> Laughter!   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> I love how you pretend to be an armchair expert on what could or   
   could   
   >>>>>>>>> not have been done.  She weaponized her vehicle and he perceived a   
   >>>>>>>>> threat to his life and safety.  Legit shoot.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> If she'd intended to drive into him, she wouldn't have been turning   
   her   
   >>>>>>>> steering wheel hard to the right...   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> ...and therefore AWAY from him.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> She saw a man moving across from her right to left, and how was she to   
   >>>>>>>> know he'd stop moving?   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> She knew exactly who he was. Stop playing stupid. Idiots   
   >>>>>>> like you trying to say "she had no idea who he was" yet he   
   >>>>>>> was wearing a uniform and her bitch wife was running   
   >>>>>>> around taunting them So that lie is debunked.   
   >>>>>> The point you missed was that he was MOVING, and if he KEPT moving, he   
   >>>>>> would have been out of the way.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> I was using "man" in the generic sense, not to suggest she didn't know   
   >>>>>> he was with ICE.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> She had been following them all day....   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Really?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> And where did you learn that?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Was it from the same people who at first told you that the agent had   
   >>>> been "run over"?   
   >>>   
   >>> First of all "run over" is a generalized term for being struck by a   
   >>> vehicle.   
   >>   
   >> First, did you read what Trump wrote:   
   >>   
   >> "who then violently, willfully, and viciously ran over the ICE Officer,"   
   >>   
   >> He also stated:   
   >>   
   >> "on the attached clip, it is hard to believe he is alive, but is now   
   >> recovering in the hospital"   
   >>   
   >> And that, too, was false.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> Second, no: it isn't.   
   >>   
   >>>   In answer to your question, I allow for the possibility that   
   >>> she followed ICE all day might be erroneous.   
   >>   
   >> And yet you stated it as an absolute fact until challenged.   
   >>   
   >>    I'm not finding any   
   >>> stories in my searches except for what the family claims which means   
   >>> we simply don't know.  I'm fine with retracting that claim if it makes   
   >>> you happy.   
   >>   
   >> It's not so much about the claim, but rather your willingness to make it   
   >> in the first place.   
   >   
   > The left lies all the time. What's your point?   
      
   So (even assuming that's true), two wrongs make a right?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)