XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump
From: nuh-uh@nope.com
On 2026-01-18 08:41, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <10khf80$2tnfv$12@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> uh@nope.com says...
>>
>> On 2026-01-17 16:06, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <10kh15n$2tajo$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-
>>> uh@nope.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 2026-01-17 06:56, NoBody wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 20:17:15 -0800, Alan wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 19:44, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <10kes86$26qks$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-
>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 18:14, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <10keiop$23gth$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-
>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 09:24, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ... and say this.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 14:34:23 -0800, Alan says...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Road?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/OC9smu9.mp4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/Lfbiqwg.jpeg
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> See those people standing thar, stoopit? WHAT are they standing
on?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Were any of those people in the direction she intended to travel?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Sure they were.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> How do YOU know where Good was "intending to travel"?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You don't.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I was making an illustrative point. YOU moved the goalposts, as
usual, with
>>>>>>>>>>> your fallacy of the specific.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> She could have gone down the street MADE A 3-POINT TURN and came
back at the
>>>>>>>>>>> officers, them, having to draw the weapons again and shoot her
again.
>>>>>>>>>> So by pretending you know her intent was to run over an "officer"...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Well you seem to be able to read minds you tell us.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So when he states her intent he's NOT reading minds?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> BUTWHATABOUT!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ...you then pretend they need to protect against future "attacks".
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> She was turning away from the officer, doofus.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On a one way street on a very icy road. No telling what
>>>>>>>>> could happen.
>>>>>>>> Actually there is "telling" that the car could not have gone to its
left
>>>>>>>> with the wheels turned right.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But it went straight.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No, it most certainly did not. COULD not have with the wheels turned all
>>>>>> the way to the right.
>>>>>
>>>>> But you claim he was standing in front. If she turned she wouldn't
>>>>> have him with the front headlight.
>>>> > > You can't have things both ways dingdong.
>>>>
>>>> 1. We don't know that he was actually hit.
>>>
>>> "we" do know.
>>
>> Nope. That's your ideology doing your thinking for you.
>>
>>>>
>>>> 2. But if he'd been standing close enough he COULD have been hit.
>>>
>>> And he was.
>>
>> Prove it.
>>
>>>>
>>>> Seriously, this isn't tough to have figured out on your own, numbnuts.
>>>
>>> Your opinions have gone from her having no idea where she
>>> was to she was only going home.
>>
>> I never said she had "no idea" where she was.
>>
>>>>
>>>> But neither changes the fact that her intent can be inferred from her
>>>> actions.
>>>
>>> How about her wifes actions?
>> Her wife's actions should have had no bearing on the agent's actions.
>>
>> Period.
>
> But they do show you lied when you said they didn't know
> who they were.
I never said that.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
