XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: nuh-uh@nope.com   
      
   On 2026-01-18 04:39, AlleyCat wrote:   
   >   
   > On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 15:47:25 -0800,  Alan says...   
   >   
   >>   
   >> On 2026-01-16 09:24, AlleyCat wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>> On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 16:07:58 -0700,  Skeeter says...   
   >>>   
   >>>>> She was a citizen attempting to turn around and depart the area.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> You read minds now?   
   >>>   
   >>> He's always thought he could read minds.   
   >> I don't need to read minds.   
   >>   
   >> The "officer's" own cellphone video shows her turning hard to her right...   
   >   
   > ...and running RIGHT into him, hard.   
      
   Nope. It shows the phone suddenly moving, but that proves nothing.   
      
   >   
   > Her "intentions" and his actions have NOTHING to do with that FACT, faggot.   
   2. Firearms may not be discharged solely to disable moving vehicles.   
   Specifically, firearms may not be discharged at a moving vehicle unless:   
   (1) a person in the vehicle is threatening the officer or another person   
   with deadly force by means other than the vehicle; or (2) the vehicle is   
   operated in a manner that threatens to cause death or serious physical   
   injury to the officer or others, and no other objectively reasonable   
   means of defense appear to exist, which includes moving out of the path   
   of the vehicle.'   
      
   Read that last part until you get it:   
      
   'and no other objectively reasonable means of defense appear to exist,   
   which includes moving out of the path of the vehicle.'   
      
   Your own lame post mentioned this, but you didn't notice.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)