XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: nuh-uh@nope.com   
      
   On 2026-01-17 07:04, AlleyCat wrote:   
   >   
   > On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 20:31:09 -0800,  Alan says...   
   >   
   >> I guess you don't drive much in winter   
   >   
   > Faggot trolls on Usenet keep losing time after time after time, so what do   
   > they do to keep their narcissistic asses from hanging themselves because   
   their   
   > self-esteem is taking too many hits?   
      
   Yada-yada-yada:   
      
   It boils down to this (which you first quoted and didn't even notice):   
      
   '2. Firearms may not be discharged solely to disable moving vehicles.   
   Specifically, firearms may not be discharged at a moving vehicle unless:   
   (1) a person in the vehicle is threatening the officer or another person   
   with deadly force by means other than the vehicle; or (2) the vehicle is   
   operated in a manner that threatens to cause death or serious physical   
   injury to the officer or others, and no other objectively reasonable   
   means of defense appear to exist, which includes moving out of the path   
   of the vehicle.'   
      
   Read that last part until you get it:   
      
   'and no other objectively reasonable means of defense appear to exist,   
   which includes moving out of the path of the vehicle.'   
      
   He had an "objectively reasonable means of defense":   
      
   Taking one more step to his right.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)