XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: nuh-uh@nope.com   
      
   On 2026-01-16 20:54, Skeeter wrote:   
   > In article <10kf27n$28hf2$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > uh@nope.com says...   
   >>   
   >> On 2026-01-16 20:10, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>> In article <10kerfe$268b0$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>   
   >>>> On 2026-01-16 18:03, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>> In article <10keh09$23gue$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> On 2026-01-16 15:12, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>>>> In article <10ke2rs$1ui33$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 09:25, AlleyCat wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 15:22:51 -0800,  Alan says...   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-14 22:52, AlleyCat wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/Tmcvpwi.mp4   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 14 Jan 2026 15:34:18 -0800,  Alan says...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> The "escaping vehicle" posed NO THREAT AT ALL.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> YOU do not know that for a fact, faggot. So... you knew that the   
   roads were   
   >>>>>>>>>>> clear all the way to where Good would have gone?   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> That's the standard?   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Did I say that?   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Yes. That's exactly what you said.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> You suggest that it is OK to shoot someone because they might   
   encounter   
   >>>>>>>> someone on the road at some point in the future.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> No he didn't. You spun it around to sound like that.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Ummmm...nope!   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> "you knew that the roads were clear all the way to where Good would have   
   >>>>>> gone?"   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> That is Loser explicitly claiming that shooting her was justified by the   
   >>>>>> mere possibility that she'd encounter someone else on the road and just   
   >>>>>> randomly decide to run them down.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> You sure can turn a mole hill into a mountain.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Why was she making a U Turn/3 point turn on a one way   
   >>>>>>> street?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Because she initially thought it wasn't a one way street.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> As she was driving down a "one way street"?  The street   
   >>>>> had a lot of cars. Why would she decide to turn around and   
   >>>>> it just by coincidence that there were ICE agents right   
   >>>>> there doing their job when her wife started running and   
   >>>>> taunting ICE. But you losers claim she didn't know who he   
   >>>>> was. Are you that stupid?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Why didn't you address the fact that you first claimed it   
   >>>>>>> was a U Turn and now call it a 3 point turn? Maybe you   
   >>>>>>> should give yourself a break. You seem confused.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Please. "U-turn" can generically mean to turn around on a road.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> On a one way street? Was it a U Turn or a 3 point turn?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Yes.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> I know this will come as a surprise to you, but people can make mistakes.   
   >>>   
   >>> It had lots of cars all going the same direction.   
   >>   
   >> True. So?   
   >   
   > So why was she trying to turn around? I just shot your   
   > bullshit story all to hell with your help.   
   >>   
   >>> She knew   
   >>> where she was.   
   >>   
   >> How do you know that?   
   >   
   > Ask her wife. Now tell me how you knew what she was doing   
   > and thinking.   
   >>   
   >>> If she didn't she shouldn't be driving and   
   >>> that makes her a danger to herself and others.   
   >>   
   >> You think that otherwise completely competent drivers never find   
   >> themselves on streets that they're not familiar with?   
   >   
   > But you said she dropped her kid off at school and was   
   > heading home. So she knew where she was. You really suck   
   > at this. You keep shooting yourself in the foot.   
   >   
   >   
      
   All of that is irrelevant in light of this:   
      
   '2. Firearms may not be discharged solely to disable moving vehicles.   
   Specifically, firearms may not be discharged at a moving vehicle unless:   
   (1) a person in the vehicle is threatening the officer or another person   
   with deadly force by means other than the vehicle; or (2) the vehicle is   
   operated in a manner that threatens to cause death or serious physical   
   injury to the officer or others, and no other objectively reasonable   
   means of defense appear to exist, which includes moving out of the path   
   of the vehicle.'   
      
   Read that last part until you get it:   
      
   'and no other objectively reasonable means of defense appear to exist,   
   which includes moving out of the path of the vehicle.'   
      
   He had an "objectively reasonable means of defense":   
      
   Taking one more step to his right.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)