XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump
From: invalid@none.com
In article <10kjp4v$3rq8m$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-
uh@nope.com says...
>
> On 2026-01-18 14:58, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <10kjnl8$3qsla$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> > uh@nope.com says...
> >>
> >> On 2026-01-18 06:28, NoBody wrote:
> >>> On Sat, 17 Jan 2026 14:26:50 -0800, Alan wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 2026-01-17 06:40, NoBody wrote:
> >>>>> On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 15:21:16 -0800, Alan wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On 2026-01-16 14:25, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>> In article <10ke30v$1ui33$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> >>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 04:30, NoBody wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> 3. Authorized Officers/Agents should avoid intentionally and
> >>>>>>>>>>>> unreasonably placing themselves in positions in which they have
no
> >>>>>>>>>>>> alternative to using deadly force.'
> >>>>>>>>>>> He did. SHE changed that equation.
> >>>>>>>>>> He chose to remain there when a single step to his right would
have
> >>>>>>>>>> taken him out of the danger area.
> >>>>>>>>> Laughter!
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I love how you pretend to be an armchair expert on what could or
could
> >>>>>>>>> not have been done. She weaponized her vehicle and he perceived a
> >>>>>>>>> threat to his life and safety. Legit shoot.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> If she'd intended to drive into him, she wouldn't have been turning
her
> >>>>>>>> steering wheel hard to the right...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> ...and therefore AWAY from him.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> She saw a man moving across from her right to left, and how was she
to
> >>>>>>>> know he'd stop moving?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> She knew exactly who he was. Stop playing stupid. Idiots
> >>>>>>> like you trying to say "she had no idea who he was" yet he
> >>>>>>> was wearing a uniform and her bitch wife was running
> >>>>>>> around taunting them So that lie is debunked.
> >>>>>> The point you missed was that he was MOVING, and if he KEPT moving, he
> >>>>>> would have been out of the way.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I was using "man" in the generic sense, not to suggest she didn't know
> >>>>>> he was with ICE.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> She had been following them all day....
> >>>>
> >>>> Really?
> >>>>
> >>>> And where did you learn that?
> >>>>
> >>>> Was it from the same people who at first told you that the agent had
> >>>> been "run over"?
> >>>
> >>> First of all "run over" is a generalized term for being struck by a
> >>> vehicle.
> >>
> >> First, did you read what Trump wrote:
> >>
> >> "who then violently, willfully, and viciously ran over the ICE Officer,"
> >>
> >> He also stated:
> >>
> >> "on the attached clip, it is hard to believe he is alive, but is now
> >> recovering in the hospital"
> >>
> >> And that, too, was false.
> >>
> >>
> >> Second, no: it isn't.
> >>
> >>> In answer to your question, I allow for the possibility that
> >>> she followed ICE all day might be erroneous.
> >>
> >> And yet you stated it as an absolute fact until challenged.
> >>
> >> I'm not finding any
> >>> stories in my searches except for what the family claims which means
> >>> we simply don't know. I'm fine with retracting that claim if it makes
> >>> you happy.
> >>
> >> It's not so much about the claim, but rather your willingness to make it
> >> in the first place.
> >
> > The left lies all the time. What's your point?
>
> So (even assuming that's true), two wrongs make a right?
You brain dead morons pull that shit all the time.
BUTWHATABOUT!
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
