Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    can.politics    |    Libs bitching about what they voted for    |    997,123 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 996,388 of 997,123    |
|    Alan to Skeeter    |
|    Re: I Knew Alan Baker Would Be A Faggot.    |
|    18 Jan 26 15:45:01    |
      XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump       From: nuh-uh@nope.com              On 2026-01-18 15:41, Skeeter wrote:       > In article <10kjpf4$3rq8m$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-       > uh@nope.com says...       >>       >> On 2026-01-18 08:43, Skeeter wrote:       >>> In article <10khfcc$2tnfv$14@dont-email.me>, nuh-       >>> uh@nope.com says...       >>>>       >>>> On 2026-01-17 15:58, Skeeter wrote:       >>>>> In article <10kh3jg$2tnfv$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-       >>>>> uh@nope.com says...       >>>>>>       >>>>>> On 2026-01-16 20:46, Skeeter wrote:       >>>>>>> In article <10kf2gb$28hf2$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-       >>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 19:44, Skeeter wrote:       >>>>>>>>> In article <10kes86$26qks$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-       >>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...       >>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 18:14, Skeeter wrote:       >>>>>>>>>>> In article <10keiop$23gth$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-       >>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...       >>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 09:24, AlleyCat wrote:       >>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>> ... and say this.       >>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 14:34:23 -0800, Alan says...       >>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Road?       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/OC9smu9.mp4       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/Lfbiqwg.jpeg       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> See those people standing thar, stoopit? WHAT are they       standing on?       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Were any of those people in the direction she intended to       travel?       >>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure they were.       >>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>> How do YOU know where Good was "intending to travel"?       >>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>> You don't.       >>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>> I was making an illustrative point. YOU moved the goalposts, as       usual, with       >>>>>>>>>>>>> your fallacy of the specific.       >>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>> She could have gone down the street MADE A 3-POINT TURN and came       back at the       >>>>>>>>>>>>> officers, them, having to draw the weapons again and shoot her       again.       >>>>>>>>>>>> So by pretending you know her intent was to run over an       "officer"...       >>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>> Well you seem to be able to read minds you tell us.       >>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>> So when he states her intent he's NOT reading minds?       >>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>> BUTWHATABOUT!       >>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>> ...you then pretend they need to protect against future "attacks".       >>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>> She was turning away from the officer, doofus.       >>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>> On a one way street on a very icy road. No telling what       >>>>>>>>>>> could happen.       >>>>>>>>>> Actually there is "telling" that the car could not have gone to its       left       >>>>>>>>>> with the wheels turned right.       >>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>> But it went straight.       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>> No, it most certainly did not. COULD not have with the wheels turned       all       >>>>>>>> the way to the right.       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>> But it did. Ice is crazy stuff.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> Ice cannot make a car with driven wheels turned to the right move       >>>>>> straight ahead from a stop.       >>>>>       >>>>> You never drove on ice.       >>>>       >>>> I've driven on ice since I learned to drive.       >>>       >>> Liar.       >>       >> Grew up in southern Ontario. Did my first driving of the family station       >> wagon while going skiing at about age 14.       >       > And I should believe that why?              I don't care whether you believe it.              >>       >>>>       >>>>>>       >>>>>> Basic physics, doofus.       >>>>>       >>>>> Why can't we reach absolute zero? Basic physics idiot.       >>>> Utterly irrelevant and a lame deflection.       >>>       >>> So you don't know basic physics.       >>       >> I know far MORE than basic physics, and that's why I know your mention       >> of "absolute zero" is a deflection.       >       > More proof you don't know shit.              So explain the relevance of mentioning it in this context.              >>       >>>>       >>>> Draw a free body diagram that shows the forces that would cause the       >>>> vehicle to move forward when the driven wheels are steered to the right.       >>>       >>> Rear wheeled vehicles can do that.       >>       >> You mean "rear wheel DRIVE vehicles" and this wasn't that.       >       > How do you know?              I looked up what vehicle she was driving.              You could have too.. ...if you'd been bright enough.              >>       >>>>       >>>> To you even know what a "free body diagram" is?       >>>       >>> You had to Google it.       >> How would I have even KNOWN to Google that term? Every accusation an       >> admission.       >       > For the left? Why you're right .       >>       >> Actually, I learned in high school physics; admittedly a class       >> equivalent to AP physics.       >       >       > You most likely flunked any class that really mattered.       LOL. Your every accusation is an admission.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca