XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: nuh-uh@nope.com   
      
   On 2026-01-18 15:42, Skeeter wrote:   
   > In article <10kjpg8$3rq8m$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > uh@nope.com says...   
   >>   
   >> On 2026-01-18 08:42, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>> In article <10khf9o$2tnfv$13@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>   
   >>>> On 2026-01-17 15:58, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>> In article <10kh3jg$2tnfv$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> On 2026-01-16 20:46, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>>>> In article <10kf2gb$28hf2$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 19:44, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> In article <10kes86$26qks$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 18:14, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> In article <10keiop$23gth$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 09:24, AlleyCat wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> ... and say this.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 14:34:23 -0800,  Alan says...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Road?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/OC9smu9.mp4   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/Lfbiqwg.jpeg   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> See those people standing thar, stoopit? WHAT are they   
   standing on?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Were any of those people in the direction she intended to   
   travel?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure they were.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> How do YOU know where Good was "intending to travel"?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> You don't.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> I was making an illustrative point. YOU moved the goalposts, as   
   usual, with   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> your fallacy of the specific.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> She could have gone down the street MADE A 3-POINT TURN and came   
   back at the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> officers, them, having to draw the weapons again and shoot her   
   again.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> So by pretending you know her intent was to run over an   
   "officer"...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Well you seem to be able to read minds you tell us.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> So when he states her intent he's NOT reading minds?   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> BUTWHATABOUT!   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> ...you then pretend they need to protect against future "attacks".   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> She was turning away from the officer, doofus.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> On a one way street on a very icy road. No telling what   
   >>>>>>>>>>> could happen.   
   >>>>>>>>>> Actually there is "telling" that the car could not have gone to its   
   left   
   >>>>>>>>>> with the wheels turned right.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> But it went straight.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> No, it most certainly did not. COULD not have with the wheels turned   
   all   
   >>>>>>>> the way to the right.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> But it did. Ice is crazy stuff.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Ice cannot make a car with driven wheels turned to the right move   
   >>>>>> straight ahead from a stop.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> You never drove on ice.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Basic physics, doofus.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Why can't we reach absolute zero? Basic physics idiot.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> And regardless, it shows her intent.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Which was to make a U Turn on a one way street and ICE   
   >>>>>>>>> just happened to be there. Yea that will sell a jury.   
   >>>>>>>> I suspect the reason she wanted to turn around was that ICE was   
   present   
   >>>>>>>> and she wanted to get out of there.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> She was there because she knew who they were. That is   
   >>>>>>> settled.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> By what source?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> By the fact they had uniforms and shit. You really are   
   >>>>> this stupid.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> That answers the "who they were" part...   
   >>>   
   >>> They knew.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> ...but not the "she was there BECAUSE" part.   
   >>>   
   >>> It will in court.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Why didn't she just keep going?   
   >>>>>> The street was being occupied by ICE agents.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Nope, she could have gone on. She knew the agents were   
   >>>>> there so why did she go anyway?   
   >>>> Yup. The videos show the many ICE vehicles there.   
   >>>   
   >>> But yo said she didn't know who they were.   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> No. In one post, I called the ICE agent "the man" as a generic term.   
   >   
   > No in many posts you suggested that she was lost or didn't   
   > know where she was. You also claimed that she didn't know   
   > they were ICE.   
      
   Nope. I never suggested she was lost.   
      
   I never suggested she didn't know the person in front of her was ice.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)