XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: nuh-uh@nope.com   
      
   On 2026-01-18 15:50, Skeeter wrote:   
   > In article <10kjpsr$3rq66$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > uh@nope.com says...   
   >>   
   >> On 2026-01-17 15:37, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>> In article <10kh33k$2tn8q$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>   
   >>>> On 2026-01-15 16:27, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>> In article <10kbuvv$15km6$25@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> On 2026-01-15 15:45, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>>>> In article <10kbr1f$15km4$9@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-14 22:58, AlleyCat wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> On Wed, 14 Jan 2026 17:09:09 -0800,  Alan says...   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> In order to complete a three-point turn and leave the area.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Deflection.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> She was parked.   
   >>>>>>>> If she'd been "parked" then her vehicle would have been stationary.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> And not sideways in the road.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> The video shows her in the middle of turning around.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Why was she turning around? She could have just drove on.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Already explained to you.   
   >>>   
   >>> It was a one way street and she knew that.   
   >>   
   >> You don't know what she knew or when she knew it.   
   >   
   > But you seem to. Interesting.   
      
   Nope. I've only pointed out what she DID>   
      
   >   
   > Anyway the cars wer all pointed in one direction for one.   
   > If she didn't know it was a one way street then she   
   > shouldn't be driving.   
      
   People make mistakes when they're stressed.   
      
   That's hardly a reason to take away a driver's license.   
      
   >>   
   >> What I know:   
   >>   
   >> '2. Firearms may not be discharged solely to disable moving vehicles.   
   >> Specifically, firearms may not be discharged at a moving vehicle unless:   
   >> (1) a person in the vehicle is threatening the officer or another person   
   >> with deadly force by means other than the vehicle; or (2) the vehicle is   
   >> operated in a manner that threatens to cause death or serious physical   
   >> injury to the officer or others, and no other objectively reasonable   
   >> means of defense appear to exist, which includes moving out of the path   
   >> of the vehicle.'   
   >>   
   >> Read that last part until you get it:   
   >>   
   >> 'and no other objectively reasonable means of defense appear to exist,   
   >> which includes moving out of the path of the vehicle.'   
   >   
   >   
   > Never get you through a trial. You need more.   
      
   Trial of whom?   
      
   Ross MANUFACTURED a situation where he could draw his weapon.   
      
   The policy explicitly states that you can't fire on a vehicle to prevent   
   it from fleeing.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)