Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    can.politics    |    Libs bitching about what they voted for    |    997,123 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 996,407 of 997,123    |
|    Alan to Skeeter    |
|    Re: Desperation Is, As Desperation Does    |
|    18 Jan 26 15:54:39    |
      XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump       From: nuh-uh@nope.com              On 2026-01-17 16:05, Skeeter wrote:       > In article <10kh30s$2tn8q$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-       > uh@nope.com says...       >>       >> On 2026-01-15 16:31, Skeeter wrote:       >>> In article <10kbv40$15km4$22@dont-email.me>, nuh-       >>> uh@nope.com says...       >>>>       >>>> On 2026-01-15 15:55, Skeeter wrote:       >>>>> In article <10kbs60$15km6$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-       >>>>> uh@nope.com says...       >>>>>>       >>>>>> On 2026-01-15 15:08, Skeeter wrote:       >>>>>>> In article <10kbpr2$15km4$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-       >>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-15 13:12, Skeeter wrote:       >>>>>>>>> In article <10kbi85$122uj$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-       >>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...       >>>>>>>>>> He chose to remain there when a single step to his right would have       >>>>>>>>>> taken him out of the danger area.       >>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>> and she would still be alive if shw just would have       >>>>>>>>> followed orders.       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>> What "order" was she given?       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>> Get out of the car.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> Show a video where that is heard.       >>>>>>       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>> I've watched the videos: there was not order given to her.       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>> There was. Why did you ignore the video of her "wife"       >>>>>>> taunting the agents?       >>>>>> How is it relevant?       >>>>>>       >>>>>> "Taunting" is most definitely free speech.       >>>>>       >>>>> You ignored that. You ignored that she was running around       >>>>> the car doing it while the other bitch was making a       >>>>> "turn"?       >>>> What relevance is it to the fact that in contravention of policy, the       >>>> "agent" stopped in front of the vehicle that he could see was about to       >>>> move ahead?       >>>       >>> Plenty, it shows intent.       >>       >> It shows his intent to create a threat in order to have a reason to shoot.       >       > So you read his mind too?              Again: inferred from his ACTIONS.              He was walking and CHOSE to stop in front of her at the time he KNEW she       would be moving away to his left.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca