home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   can.politics      Libs bitching about what they voted for      997,123 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 996,407 of 997,123   
   Alan to Skeeter   
   Re: Desperation Is, As Desperation Does   
   18 Jan 26 15:54:39   
   
   XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: nuh-uh@nope.com   
      
   On 2026-01-17 16:05, Skeeter wrote:   
   > In article <10kh30s$2tn8q$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > uh@nope.com says...   
   >>   
   >> On 2026-01-15 16:31, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>> In article <10kbv40$15km4$22@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>   
   >>>> On 2026-01-15 15:55, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>> In article <10kbs60$15km6$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> On 2026-01-15 15:08, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>>>> In article <10kbpr2$15km4$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-15 13:12, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> In article <10kbi85$122uj$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>>>>> He chose to remain there when a single step to his right would have   
   >>>>>>>>>> taken him out of the danger area.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> and she would still be alive if shw just would have   
   >>>>>>>>> followed orders.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> What "order" was she given?   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Get out of the car.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Show a video where that is heard.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> I've watched the videos: there was not order given to her.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> There was. Why did you ignore the video of her "wife"   
   >>>>>>> taunting the agents?   
   >>>>>> How is it relevant?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> "Taunting" is most definitely free speech.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> You ignored that. You ignored that she was running around   
   >>>>> the car doing it while the other bitch was making a   
   >>>>> "turn"?   
   >>>> What relevance is it to the fact that in contravention of policy, the   
   >>>> "agent" stopped in front of the vehicle that he could see was about to   
   >>>> move ahead?   
   >>>   
   >>> Plenty, it shows intent.   
   >>   
   >> It shows his intent to create a threat in order to have a reason to shoot.   
   >   
   > So you read his mind too?   
      
   Again: inferred from his ACTIONS.   
      
   He was walking and CHOSE to stop in front of her at the time he KNEW she   
   would be moving away to his left.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca