Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    can.politics    |    Libs bitching about what they voted for    |    997,123 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 996,411 of 997,123    |
|    Alan to Skeeter    |
|    Re: Desperation Is, As Desperation Does    |
|    18 Jan 26 15:55:28    |
      XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump       From: nuh-uh@nope.com              On 2026-01-17 16:04, Skeeter wrote:       > In article <10kh2io$2tn8q$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-       > uh@nope.com says...       >>       >> On 2026-01-16 20:31, Skeeter wrote:       >>> In article <10kf2eh$28hf2$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-       >>> uh@nope.com says...       >>>>       >>>> On 2026-01-16 19:44, Skeeter wrote:       >>>>> In article <10kerg2$268b0$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-       >>>>> uh@nope.com says...       >>>>>>       >>>>>> On 2026-01-16 18:03, Skeeter wrote:       >>>>>>> In article <10keh5c$23gue$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-       >>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 14:25, Skeeter wrote:       >>>>>>>>> In article <10ke30v$1ui33$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-       >>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...       >>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 04:30, NoBody wrote:       >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. Authorized Officers/Agents should avoid intentionally and       >>>>>>>>>>>>>> unreasonably placing themselves in positions in which they have       no       >>>>>>>>>>>>>> alternative to using deadly force.'       >>>>>>>>>>>>> He did. SHE changed that equation.       >>>>>>>>>>>> He chose to remain there when a single step to his right would       have       >>>>>>>>>>>> taken him out of the danger area.       >>>>>>>>>>> Laughter!       >>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>> I love how you pretend to be an armchair expert on what could or       could       >>>>>>>>>>> not have been done. She weaponized her vehicle and he perceived a       >>>>>>>>>>> threat to his life and safety. Legit shoot.       >>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>> If she'd intended to drive into him, she wouldn't have been turning       her       >>>>>>>>>> steering wheel hard to the right...       >>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>> ...and therefore AWAY from him.       >>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>> She saw a man moving across from her right to left, and how was she       to       >>>>>>>>>> know he'd stop moving?       >>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>> She knew exactly who he was. Stop playing stupid. Idiots       >>>>>>>>> like you trying to say "she had no idea who he was" yet he       >>>>>>>>> was wearing a uniform and her bitch wife was running       >>>>>>>>> around taunting them So that lie is debunked.       >>>>>>>> The point you missed was that he was MOVING, and if he KEPT moving, he       >>>>>>>> would have been out of the way.       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>> I was using "man" in the generic sense, not to suggest she didn't know       >>>>>>>> he was with ICE.       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>> Oh she knew.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> I know that.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> I was never trying to deny it.       >>>>>       >>>>> You tried and failed. He was wearing an ICE uniform fer       >>>>> crissakes.       >>>>       >>>> My POINT at the time was that the driver saw SOMEONE moving to her left       >>>> when she was intending to go right. It doesn't matter WHO that someone       was.       >>>       >>> It dod to her.       >>       >> Nope. Not regarding the question of her intent.       >       > Her intent was to agitate ICE agents.              Even if that were true, it's no justification for shooting her or even       arresting her.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca