XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: nuh-uh@nope.com   
      
   On 2026-01-16 21:03, Skeeter wrote:   
   > In article <10kf382$28hf2$9@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > uh@nope.com says...   
   >>   
   >> On 2026-01-16 20:17, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>> In article <10keu90$27aph$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>   
   >>>> On 2026-01-16 18:54, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>> In article <10ken1m$24cdg$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> On 2026-01-16 16:57, Socialism is for losers wrote:   
   >>>>>>> On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 16:53:06 -0800, Alan wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 16:38, Socialism is for losers wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> The car sure jerked ahead as it hit him.   
   >>>>>>>>>> Nope. The "officer" might have jerked, but there is video taken from   
   >>>>>>>>>> outside the car and it moved off in a completely ordinary manner.   
   >>>>>>>>> No, it jerked ahead.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> There is a video that shows it did not.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> And you haven't addressed that she was clearly steering away from   
   him...   
   >>>>>>>>> ...and yet she hit him.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> ...which she wouldn't have been doing if she was "weaponizing her   
   car".   
   >>>>>>>>> Nonsense. She had to have known that she'd hit him. She just didn't   
   >>>>>>>>> expect that he'd be ready with a gun.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> On the contrary.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> He was clearly moving as she began to back and turn her wheel left.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Then he CHOOSES to stop in front of the left corner of her car and   
   draw   
   >>>>>>>> his weapon when one more step to his right would have put him out of   
   any   
   >>>>>>>> danger being struck.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Her intent to simply leave can be inferred from the fact that she was   
   >>>>>>>> turning away from him. His own cellphone video shows it.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> I understand your need to misrepresent what happened.   
   >>>>>> There is no misrepresentation.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Her clear intention is to complete a turn and leave the area.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> On a one way street?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Yup. She came upon an ICE operation while driving home and at first   
   >>>> tried to turn around to leave the way she'd come, then she realized that   
   >>>> the street was one way, so half way through a three point turn, she   
   >>>> changed her mind and proceed to get her car pointed back in the correct   
   >>>> direction.   
   >>>   
   >>> So you can read minds. How do you explain her wife running   
   >>> around and filing and taunting ICE? I thought Renee was   
   >>> just "turning around".   
   >>   
   >> In a chaotic situation, her wife decided to get out to document what was   
   >> happening, and maybe to help guide Good in backing up in a tight space.   
   >   
   > Yea that what she was doing by running around the car   
   > yelling and screaming. That was a lot of help I bet.   
   > "Drive baby drive" That will be brought up in court you   
   > can bet.   
      
   To show what about Ross's actions/   
      
   >>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> She waved ICE vehicles by   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> But you said she didn't know who they were.   
   >>>> Nope. I used the term "man" in a generic sense with no comment on her   
   >>>> knowledge at all.   
   >>>   
   >>> She knew who they were. Her wife made that obvious.   
   >> And that's irrelevant in the context of my use of the word "man".   
   >   
   > No you just choose to ignore it.   
      
   Nope!   
      
   >>   
   >> It never had anything to do with trying to claim Good didn't know the   
   >> man was with ICE.   
   >   
   > Now you flip again. Earlier you said she had no idea who   
   > he was. Your foot must be getting sore.   
   I never said that.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|