XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: nuh-uh@nope.com   
      
   On 2026-01-17 16:12, Skeeter wrote:   
   > In article <10kh0vt$2tajo$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > uh@nope.com says...   
   >>   
   >> On 2026-01-17 00:30, Socialism is for losers wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> who weaponize her car.   
   >>>>>>>>>> Who was just trying to leave the area.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> By stomping on the gas with a man standing in front of her car?   
   >>>>>>>> By turning her wheel all the way to her right and assuming that a man   
   >>>>>>>> who had been walking to her left would continue to walk left.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> And there was no "stomping".   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> The car sure jerked ahead as it hit him.   
   >>>>>> Nope. The "officer" might have jerked, but there is video taken from   
   >>>>>> outside the car and it moved off in a completely ordinary manner.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> It jerked.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> The officer seems to have jerked in his cellphone video...   
   >>>>   
   >>>> ...but that doesn't prove that he was struck.   
   >>>   
   >>> The other videos show he was hit.   
   >>   
   >> No video shows it. Not one.   
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>> Moving himself quickly out of the way could produce such a jerk.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> And you haven't addressed that she was clearly steering away from him..   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Well she's a shitty driver then. Besides she was making a   
   >>>>> u turn on a one way street. You defended her by saying she   
   >>>>> didn't know it was a one way street. So not only is she a   
   >>>>> shitty driver she shouldn't even be driving at all.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> None of that changes that she was steering away from him.   
   >>>   
   >>> She still hit him   
   >>   
   >> That is, as yet, unproven.   
   >   
   > And you can prove otherwise.   
      
   I don't have to prove it, because it's not my claim that he was hit.   
      
   It's your claim and it's based on no actual evidence at all.   
      
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>>>>> ...which she wouldn't have been doing if she was "weaponizing her car".   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Oh you read her mind? How many time have you personally   
   >>>>> been in the same situation? Never? Then STFU.   
   >>>> If her intent was to hit him, she chose a course of action that   
   >>>> absolutely minimized the chance.   
   >> Got no answer for that part, huh?   
   >   
   > This coming from the kook who ran away from half the   
   > threads he was in.   
   LOL!   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)