XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: nuh-uh@nope.com   
      
   On 2026-01-18 16:04, Skeeter wrote:   
   > In article <10kjrtg$3rq66$19@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > uh@nope.com says...   
   >>   
   >> On 2026-01-17 16:04, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>> In article <10kh2io$2tn8q$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>   
   >>>> On 2026-01-16 20:31, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>> In article <10kf2eh$28hf2$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> On 2026-01-16 19:44, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>>>> In article <10kerg2$268b0$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 18:03, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> In article <10keh5c$23gue$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 14:25, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> In article <10ke30v$1ui33$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 04:30, NoBody wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. Authorized Officers/Agents should avoid intentionally and   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unreasonably placing themselves in positions in which they   
   have no   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alternative to using deadly force.'   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He did.  SHE changed that equation.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> He chose to remain there when a single step to his right would   
   have   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> taken him out of the danger area.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> Laughter!   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> I love how you pretend to be an armchair expert on what could or   
   could   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> not have been done.  She weaponized her vehicle and he perceived   
   a   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> threat to his life and safety.  Legit shoot.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> If she'd intended to drive into him, she wouldn't have been   
   turning her   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> steering wheel hard to the right...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> ...and therefore AWAY from him.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> She saw a man moving across from her right to left, and how was   
   she to   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> know he'd stop moving?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> She knew exactly who he was. Stop playing stupid. Idiots   
   >>>>>>>>>>> like you trying to say "she had no idea who he was" yet he   
   >>>>>>>>>>> was wearing a uniform and her bitch wife was running   
   >>>>>>>>>>> around taunting them So that lie is debunked.   
   >>>>>>>>>> The point you missed was that he was MOVING, and if he KEPT moving,   
   he   
   >>>>>>>>>> would have been out of the way.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> I was using "man" in the generic sense, not to suggest she didn't   
   know   
   >>>>>>>>>> he was with ICE.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Oh she knew.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> I know that.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> I was never trying to deny it.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> You tried and failed. He was wearing an ICE uniform fer   
   >>>>>>> crissakes.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> My POINT at the time was that the driver saw SOMEONE moving to her left   
   >>>>>> when she was intending to go right. It doesn't matter WHO that someone   
   was.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> It dod to her.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Nope. Not regarding the question of her intent.   
   >>>   
   >>> Her intent was to agitate ICE agents.   
   >>   
   >> Even if that were true, it's no justification for shooting her or even   
   >> arresting her.   
   >   
   > That intent will be important in court. You just don't get   
   > it do you?   
      
   What was his intent in stopping when he'd been moving out of the way?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)