XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: invalid@none.com   
      
   In article <10kjrbp$3rq66$13@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   uh@nope.com says...   
   >   
   > On 2026-01-18 15:42, Skeeter wrote:   
   > > In article <10kjpg8$3rq8m$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > > uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>   
   > >> On 2026-01-18 08:42, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>> In article <10khf9o$2tnfv$13@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > >>> uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> On 2026-01-17 15:58, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>>>> In article <10kh3jg$2tnfv$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > >>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> On 2026-01-16 20:46, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>>>>>> In article <10kf2gb$28hf2$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > >>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 19:44, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>> In article <10kes86$26qks$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > >>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 18:14, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> In article <10keiop$23gth$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 09:24, AlleyCat wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> ... and say this.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 14:34:23 -0800,  Alan says...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Road?   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/OC9smu9.mp4   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/Lfbiqwg.jpeg   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> See those people standing thar, stoopit? WHAT are they   
   standing on?   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Were any of those people in the direction she intended to   
   travel?   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure they were.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> How do YOU know where Good was "intending to travel"?   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> You don't.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I was making an illustrative point. YOU moved the goalposts,   
   as usual, with   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> your fallacy of the specific.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> She could have gone down the street MADE A 3-POINT TURN and   
   came back at the   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> officers, them, having to draw the weapons again and shoot her   
   again.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> So by pretending you know her intent was to run over an   
   "officer"...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> Well you seem to be able to read minds you tell us.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>> So when he states her intent he's NOT reading minds?   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> BUTWHATABOUT!   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> ...you then pretend they need to protect against future   
   "attacks".   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> She was turning away from the officer, doofus.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> On a one way street on a very icy road. No telling what   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> could happen.   
   > >>>>>>>>>> Actually there is "telling" that the car could not have gone to   
   its left   
   > >>>>>>>>>> with the wheels turned right.   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> But it went straight.   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> No, it most certainly did not. COULD not have with the wheels   
   turned all   
   > >>>>>>>> the way to the right.   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> But it did. Ice is crazy stuff.   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> Ice cannot make a car with driven wheels turned to the right move   
   > >>>>>> straight ahead from a stop.   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> You never drove on ice.   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> Basic physics, doofus.   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> Why can't we reach absolute zero? Basic physics idiot.   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>> And regardless, it shows her intent.   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> Which was to make a U Turn on a one way street and ICE   
   > >>>>>>>>> just happened to be there. Yea that will sell a jury.   
   > >>>>>>>> I suspect the reason she wanted to turn around was that ICE was   
   present   
   > >>>>>>>> and she wanted to get out of there.   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> She was there because she knew who they were. That is   
   > >>>>>>> settled.   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> By what source?   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> By the fact they had uniforms and shit. You really are   
   > >>>>> this stupid.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> That answers the "who they were" part...   
   > >>>   
   > >>> They knew.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> ...but not the "she was there BECAUSE" part.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> It will in court.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> Why didn't she just keep going?   
   > >>>>>> The street was being occupied by ICE agents.   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> Nope, she could have gone on. She knew the agents were   
   > >>>>> there so why did she go anyway?   
   > >>>> Yup. The videos show the many ICE vehicles there.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> But yo said she didn't know who they were.   
   > >>>   
   > >>>   
   > >>   
   > >> No. In one post, I called the ICE agent "the man" as a generic term.   
   > >   
   > > No in many posts you suggested that she was lost or didn't   
   > > know where she was. You also claimed that she didn't know   
   > > they were ICE.   
   >   
   > Nope. I never suggested she was lost.   
      
   You did.   
   >   
   > I never suggested she didn't know the person in front of her was ice.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)