Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    can.politics    |    Libs bitching about what they voted for    |    997,123 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 996,437 of 997,123    |
|    Skeeter to All    |
|    Re: I Knew Alan Baker Would Be A Faggot.    |
|    18 Jan 26 17:48:33    |
      XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump       From: invalid@none.com              In article <10kjsu0$3rq66$33@dont-email.me>, nuh-       uh@nope.com says...       >       > On 2026-01-18 16:08, Skeeter wrote:       > > In article <10kjr9t$3rq66$12@dont-email.me>, nuh-       > > uh@nope.com says...       > >>       > >> On 2026-01-18 15:41, Skeeter wrote:       > >>> In article <10kjpf4$3rq8m$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-       > >>> uh@nope.com says...       > >>>>       > >>>> On 2026-01-18 08:43, Skeeter wrote:       > >>>>> In article <10khfcc$2tnfv$14@dont-email.me>, nuh-       > >>>>> uh@nope.com says...       > >>>>>>       > >>>>>> On 2026-01-17 15:58, Skeeter wrote:       > >>>>>>> In article <10kh3jg$2tnfv$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-       > >>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...       > >>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 20:46, Skeeter wrote:       > >>>>>>>>> In article <10kf2gb$28hf2$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-       > >>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...       > >>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 19:44, Skeeter wrote:       > >>>>>>>>>>> In article <10kes86$26qks$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-       > >>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...       > >>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 18:14, Skeeter wrote:       > >>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <10keiop$23gth$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-       > >>>>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 09:24, AlleyCat wrote:       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ... and say this.       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 14:34:23 -0800, Alan says...       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Road?       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/OC9smu9.mp4       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/Lfbiqwg.jpeg       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> See those people standing thar, stoopit? WHAT are they       standing on?       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Were any of those people in the direction she intended to       travel?       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure they were.       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How do YOU know where Good was "intending to travel"?       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You don't.       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was making an illustrative point. YOU moved the goalposts,       as usual, with       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your fallacy of the specific.       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> She could have gone down the street MADE A 3-POINT TURN and       came back at the       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> officers, them, having to draw the weapons again and shoot       her again.       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So by pretending you know her intent was to run over an       "officer"...       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Well you seem to be able to read minds you tell us.       > >>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>> So when he states her intent he's NOT reading minds?       > >>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>> BUTWHATABOUT!       > >>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...you then pretend they need to protect against future       "attacks".       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> She was turning away from the officer, doofus.       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On a one way street on a very icy road. No telling what       > >>>>>>>>>>>>> could happen.       > >>>>>>>>>>>> Actually there is "telling" that the car could not have gone to       its left       > >>>>>>>>>>>> with the wheels turned right.       > >>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>> But it went straight.       > >>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>> No, it most certainly did not. COULD not have with the wheels       turned all       > >>>>>>>>>> the way to the right.       > >>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>> But it did. Ice is crazy stuff.       > >>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>> Ice cannot make a car with driven wheels turned to the right move       > >>>>>>>> straight ahead from a stop.       > >>>>>>>       > >>>>>>> You never drove on ice.       > >>>>>>       > >>>>>> I've driven on ice since I learned to drive.       > >>>>>       > >>>>> Liar.       > >>>>       > >>>> Grew up in southern Ontario. Did my first driving of the family station       > >>>> wagon while going skiing at about age 14.       > >>>       > >>> And I should believe that why?       > >>       > >> I don't care whether you believe it.       > >       > > Translation: I lied.       > >>       > >>>>       > >>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>> Basic physics, doofus.       > >>>>>>>       > >>>>>>> Why can't we reach absolute zero? Basic physics idiot.       > >>>>>> Utterly irrelevant and a lame deflection.       > >>>>>       > >>>>> So you don't know basic physics.       > >>>>       > >>>> I know far MORE than basic physics, and that's why I know your mention       > >>>> of "absolute zero" is a deflection.       > >>>       > >>> More proof you don't know shit.       > >>       > >> So explain the relevance of mentioning it in this context.       > >       > > Just to show you talk about physics yet you don't know       > > shit about it.       >       > But it failed to show that, so...              That you don't know shit about it? I agree.       >       > >>       > >>>>       > >>>>>>       > >>>>>> Draw a free body diagram that shows the forces that would cause the       > >>>>>> vehicle to move forward when the driven wheels are steered to the       right.       > >>>>>       > >>>>> Rear wheeled vehicles can do that.       > >>>>       > >>>> You mean "rear wheel DRIVE vehicles" and this wasn't that.       > >>>       > >>> How do you know?       > >>       > >> I looked up what vehicle she was driving.       > >>       > >> You could have too.. ...if you'd been bright enough.       > >       > > Prove it. You really are obsessed with this shit huh?       >       > Google "Renee good vehicle".       >       > Read the Wikipedia article.       >       > Done.              Wikipedia = LOL       >       > >>       > >>>>       > >>>>>>       > >>>>>> To you even know what a "free body diagram" is?       > >>>>>       > >>>>> You had to Google it.       > >>>> How would I have even KNOWN to Google that term? Every accusation an       > >>>> admission.       > >>>       > >>> For the left? Why you're right .       > >>>>       > >>>> Actually, I learned in high school physics; admittedly a class       > >>>> equivalent to AP physics.       > >>>       > >>>       > >>> You most likely flunked any class that really mattered.       > >> LOL. Your every accusation is an admission.       > >       > > Nothing original? Got to copy us now?       > Who is "us"?              Answer the question.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca