XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: invalid@none.com   
      
   In article <10kjsb8$3rq66$23@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   uh@nope.com says...   
   >   
   > On 2026-01-17 16:10, Skeeter wrote:   
   > > In article <10kh0u8$2tajo$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >   
   > >>>>> So? She wasn't the brightest bulb in the box.   
   > >>>> How bright do you have to be to know that turning right is going to make   
   > >>>> it less likely to his someone if that were your intent?   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> Even YOU are bright enough for that...   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> ...I think.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> We'll never know what her intent was, and it doesn't matter in the   
   > >>> slightest...   
   > >>>   
   > >>> Here's the facts:   
   > >>>   
   > >>> 1) She knew he was in frront of her car and she drove in such a manner   
   > >>> as to hit him.   
   > >>   
   > >> False. She knew he was MOVING from her right to left and she drove in a   
   > >> manner to avoid him.   
   > >   
   > > Reading minds again?   
   >   
   > Her actions show it.   
   >   
   > He was moving to her left, she steered to her right.   
   >   
   > >>   
   > >>>   
   > >>> 2) He thought his life was in danger and he shot her.   
   > >>   
   > >> When all the use of force policies specifically say he cannot claim the   
   > >> threat of a vehicle when he could have moved out of the way...   
   > >   
   > > POLICIES!   
   >   
   > Indeed. Policies he violated.   
   >   
   > >>   
   > >> ...which he could have.   
   > >>   
   > >>>   
   > >>> 3) She had no compelling reason to drive forward.   
   > >>   
   > >> To exit the area.   
   > >   
   > > Side ways?   
   >   
   > To her right. Forward and to her right.   
   >   
   > >>   
   > >>>   
   > >>> It also doesn't matter in the slightest what he could have done   
   > >>> differently so as not to be in front of her car at the time. The facts   
   > >>> that he was there and that she knew it put her in the wrong for   
   > >>> driving forward and hitting him.   
   > >> She had no reason to believe he'd stop, and her attention was divided at   
   > >> that exact moment by another ICE agent grabbing at her driver's door.   
   > >   
   > > So. She should have just gone forward.   
   > If at that point, she would have "just gone forward" she would have been   
   > driving into the ICE agent who chose to stop in front of her.   
   >   
   > But she CHOSE to steer to her right; the area that he was vacating until   
   > he stopped.   
      
   Not guilty.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)