Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    can.politics    |    Libs bitching about what they voted for    |    997,123 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 996,442 of 997,123    |
|    Skeeter to All    |
|    Re: Not Only Does Faggot Cangaydian Thin    |
|    18 Jan 26 17:57:21    |
      XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump       From: invalid@none.com              In article <10kjsj9$3rq66$27@dont-email.me>, nuh-       uh@nope.com says...       >       > On 2026-01-18 15:55, Skeeter wrote:       > > In article <10kjqbu$3rq8m$15@dont-email.me>, nuh-       > > uh@nope.com says...       > >>       > >> On 2026-01-16 20:54, Skeeter wrote:       > >>> In article <10kf27n$28hf2$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-       > >>> uh@nope.com says...       > >>>>       > >>>> On 2026-01-16 20:10, Skeeter wrote:       > >>>>> In article <10kerfe$268b0$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-       > >>>>> uh@nope.com says...       > >>>>>>       > >>>>>> On 2026-01-16 18:03, Skeeter wrote:       > >>>>>>> In article <10keh09$23gue$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-       > >>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...       > >>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 15:12, Skeeter wrote:       > >>>>>>>>> In article <10ke2rs$1ui33$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-       > >>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...       > >>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 09:25, AlleyCat wrote:       > >>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 15:22:51 -0800, Alan says...       > >>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-14 22:52, AlleyCat wrote:       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/Tmcvpwi.mp4       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 14 Jan 2026 15:34:18 -0800, Alan says...       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The "escaping vehicle" posed NO THREAT AT ALL.       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>> YOU do not know that for a fact, faggot. So... you knew that       the roads were       > >>>>>>>>>>>>> clear all the way to where Good would have gone?       > >>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>> That's the standard?       > >>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>> Did I say that?       > >>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>> Yes. That's exactly what you said.       > >>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>> You suggest that it is OK to shoot someone because they might       encounter       > >>>>>>>>>> someone on the road at some point in the future.       > >>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>> No he didn't. You spun it around to sound like that.       > >>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>> Ummmm...nope!       > >>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>> "you knew that the roads were clear all the way to where Good would       have       > >>>>>>>> gone?"       > >>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>> That is Loser explicitly claiming that shooting her was justified       by the       > >>>>>>>> mere possibility that she'd encounter someone else on the road and       just       > >>>>>>>> randomly decide to run them down.       > >>>>>>>       > >>>>>>> You sure can turn a mole hill into a mountain.       > >>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>> Why was she making a U Turn/3 point turn on a one way       > >>>>>>>>> street?       > >>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>> Because she initially thought it wasn't a one way street.       > >>>>>>>       > >>>>>>> As she was driving down a "one way street"? The street       > >>>>>>> had a lot of cars. Why would she decide to turn around and       > >>>>>>> it just by coincidence that there were ICE agents right       > >>>>>>> there doing their job when her wife started running and       > >>>>>>> taunting ICE. But you losers claim she didn't know who he       > >>>>>>> was. Are you that stupid?       > >>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>> Why didn't you address the fact that you first claimed it       > >>>>>>>>> was a U Turn and now call it a 3 point turn? Maybe you       > >>>>>>>>> should give yourself a break. You seem confused.       > >>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>> Please. "U-turn" can generically mean to turn around on a road.       > >>>>>>>       > >>>>>>> On a one way street? Was it a U Turn or a 3 point turn?       > >>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>       > >>>>>>       > >>>>>> Yes.       > >>>>>>       > >>>>>> I know this will come as a surprise to you, but people can make       mistakes.       > >>>>>       > >>>>> It had lots of cars all going the same direction.       > >>>>       > >>>> True. So?       > >>>       > >>> So why was she trying to turn around? I just shot your       > >>> bullshit story all to hell with your help.       > >>>>       > >>>>> She knew       > >>>>> where she was.       > >>>>       > >>>> How do you know that?       > >>>       > >>> Ask her wife. Now tell me how you knew what she was doing       > >>> and thinking.       > >>>>       > >>>>> If she didn't she shouldn't be driving and       > >>>>> that makes her a danger to herself and others.       > >>>>       > >>>> You think that otherwise completely competent drivers never find       > >>>> themselves on streets that they're not familiar with?       > >>>       > >>> But you said she dropped her kid off at school and was       > >>> heading home. So she knew where she was. You really suck       > >>> at this. You keep shooting yourself in the foot.       > >>>       > > In court theis is Alan:       > >>       > >> All of that is irrelevant in light of this:       > >>       > >> '2. Firearms may not be discharged solely to disable moving vehicles.       > >> Specifically, firearms may not be discharged at a moving vehicle unless:       > >> (1) a person in the vehicle is threatening the officer or another person       > >> with deadly force by means other than the vehicle; or (2) the vehicle is       > >> operated in a manner that threatens to cause death or serious physical       > >> injury to the officer or others, and no other objectively reasonable       > >> means of defense appear to exist, which includes moving out of the path       > >> of the vehicle.'       > >>       > >> Read that last part until you get it:       > >>       > >> 'and no other objectively reasonable means of defense appear to exist,       > >> which includes moving out of the path of the vehicle.'       > >>       > >> He had an "objectively reasonable means of defense":       > >>       > >> Taking one more step to his right.       > >       > >       > > The jusr and judge: Not guilty.       >       > He had a reasonable means of avoiding a threat even if one had been       > intended. All he had to do was not stop walking where he did.              Still not guilty. and rich.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca