XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: invalid@none.com   
      
   In article <10kjsco$3rq66$24@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   uh@nope.com says...   
   >   
   > On 2026-01-17 16:12, Skeeter wrote:   
   > > In article <10kh0vt$2tajo$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > > uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>   
   > >> On 2026-01-17 00:30, Socialism is for losers wrote:   
   > >>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> who weaponize her car.   
   > >>>>>>>>>> Who was just trying to leave the area.   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> By stomping on the gas with a man standing in front of her car?   
   > >>>>>>>> By turning her wheel all the way to her right and assuming that a   
   man   
   > >>>>>>>> who had been walking to her left would continue to walk left.   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> And there was no "stomping".   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> The car sure jerked ahead as it hit him.   
   > >>>>>> Nope. The "officer" might have jerked, but there is video taken from   
   > >>>>>> outside the car and it moved off in a completely ordinary manner.   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> It jerked.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> The officer seems to have jerked in his cellphone video...   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> ...but that doesn't prove that he was struck.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> The other videos show he was hit.   
   > >>   
   > >> No video shows it. Not one.   
   > >>   
   > >>>   
   > >>>   
   > >>>> Moving himself quickly out of the way could produce such a jerk.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> And you haven't addressed that she was clearly steering away from   
   him..   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> Well she's a shitty driver then. Besides she was making a   
   > >>>>> u turn on a one way street. You defended her by saying she   
   > >>>>> didn't know it was a one way street. So not only is she a   
   > >>>>> shitty driver she shouldn't even be driving at all.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> None of that changes that she was steering away from him.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> She still hit him   
   > >>   
   > >> That is, as yet, unproven.   
   > >   
   > > And you can prove otherwise.   
   >   
   > I don't have to prove it, because it's not my claim that he was hit.   
      
   And away he runs.   
   >   
   > It's your claim and it's based on no actual evidence at all.   
      
   I saw what I saw.   
   >   
   > >>   
   > >>>   
   > >>>>>> ...which she wouldn't have been doing if she was "weaponizing her   
   car".   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> Oh you read her mind? How many time have you personally   
   > >>>>> been in the same situation? Never? Then STFU.   
   > >>>> If her intent was to hit him, she chose a course of action that   
   > >>>> absolutely minimized the chance.   
   > >> Got no answer for that part, huh?   
   > >   
   > > This coming from the kook who ran away from half the   
   > > threads he was in.   
   > LOL!   
      
   And that's hs white flag.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)