XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: nuh-uh@nope.com   
      
   On 2026-01-18 16:41, Skeeter wrote:   
   > In article <10kjrqc$3rq66$17@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > uh@nope.com says...   
   >>   
   >> On 2026-01-18 15:52, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>> In article <10kjpuf$3rq66$8@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>   
   >>>> On 2026-01-17 15:37, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>> In article <10kh336$2tn8q$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> On 2026-01-15 16:29, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> His: tell us of his training. Tell us what HIS training was when   
   he was about   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> to be run over by a domestic insurrectionist terrorist, who was   
   blocking him   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> and his fellow federal agents, from performing his/their duties   
   as ICE agents.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> I thought you'd never ask!   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> 'Chapter 1: General Guidelines   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> WHOSE "guidelines?   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> The Customs and Border Patrol's "Use of Force Policy".   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> All go out the window when someone is trying to run you   
   >>>>>>>>> over.   
   >>>>>>>> No. That is exactly when the policy comes into play.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Fuck the policy? You are just looking for an excuse to   
   >>>>>>> hate.   
   >>>>>> The policy exists to protect both law enforcement and citizens.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> He violated that policy to CREATE a threat.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> So you do admit it exists.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Admit what: that a policy exists which he violated?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> '2. Firearms may not be discharged solely to disable moving vehicles.   
   >>>> Specifically, firearms may not be discharged at a moving vehicle unless:   
   >>>> (1) a person in the vehicle is threatening the officer or another person   
   >>>> with deadly force by means other than the vehicle; or (2) the vehicle is   
   >>>> operated in a manner that threatens to cause death or serious physical   
   >>>> injury to the officer or others, and no other objectively reasonable   
   >>>> means of defense appear to exist, which includes moving out of the path   
   >>>> of the vehicle.'   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Read that last part until you get it:   
   >>>>   
   >>>> 'and no other objectively reasonable means of defense appear to exist,   
   >>>> which includes moving out of the path of the vehicle.'   
   >>>   
   >>> Admit we don't do court here like you do in commie   
   >>> KKKanada. The jury will also look at the things that   
   >>> happened and the reaction and realize that he was self   
   >>> defending. Happens a lot.   
   >>   
   >> Not when the see he could simply have stepped out of the way.   
   >   
   > Nope. Reread what I wrote.   
      
   Sure.   
      
   Done.   
      
   He could still have just kept walking and never been in a position to be   
   struck  at all.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)