Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    can.politics    |    Libs bitching about what they voted for    |    997,123 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 996,461 of 997,123    |
|    Alan to Skeeter    |
|    Re: I Knew Alan Baker Would Be A Faggot.    |
|    19 Jan 26 14:11:03    |
      XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump       From: nuh-uh@nope.com              On 2026-01-18 16:48, Skeeter wrote:       > In article <10kjsu0$3rq66$33@dont-email.me>, nuh-       > uh@nope.com says...       >>       >> On 2026-01-18 16:08, Skeeter wrote:       >>> In article <10kjr9t$3rq66$12@dont-email.me>, nuh-       >>> uh@nope.com says...       >>>>       >>>> On 2026-01-18 15:41, Skeeter wrote:       >>>>> In article <10kjpf4$3rq8m$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-       >>>>> uh@nope.com says...       >>>>>>       >>>>>> On 2026-01-18 08:43, Skeeter wrote:       >>>>>>> In article <10khfcc$2tnfv$14@dont-email.me>, nuh-       >>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-17 15:58, Skeeter wrote:       >>>>>>>>> In article <10kh3jg$2tnfv$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-       >>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...       >>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 20:46, Skeeter wrote:       >>>>>>>>>>> In article <10kf2gb$28hf2$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-       >>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...       >>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 19:44, Skeeter wrote:       >>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <10kes86$26qks$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-       >>>>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 18:14, Skeeter wrote:       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <10keiop$23gth$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 09:24, AlleyCat wrote:       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ... and say this.       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 14:34:23 -0800, Alan says...       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Road?       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/OC9smu9.mp4       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/Lfbiqwg.jpeg       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> See those people standing thar, stoopit? WHAT are they       standing on?       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Were any of those people in the direction she intended to       travel?       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure they were.       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How do YOU know where Good was "intending to travel"?       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You don't.       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was making an illustrative point. YOU moved the goalposts,       as usual, with       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your fallacy of the specific.       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> She could have gone down the street MADE A 3-POINT TURN and       came back at the       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> officers, them, having to draw the weapons again and shoot       her again.       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So by pretending you know her intent was to run over an       "officer"...       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well you seem to be able to read minds you tell us.       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So when he states her intent he's NOT reading minds?       >>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>> BUTWHATABOUT!       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...you then pretend they need to protect against future       "attacks".       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> She was turning away from the officer, doofus.       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On a one way street on a very icy road. No telling what       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could happen.       >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Actually there is "telling" that the car could not have gone to       its left       >>>>>>>>>>>>>> with the wheels turned right.       >>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>> But it went straight.       >>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>> No, it most certainly did not. COULD not have with the wheels       turned all       >>>>>>>>>>>> the way to the right.       >>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>> But it did. Ice is crazy stuff.       >>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>> Ice cannot make a car with driven wheels turned to the right move       >>>>>>>>>> straight ahead from a stop.       >>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>> You never drove on ice.       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>> I've driven on ice since I learned to drive.       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>> Liar.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> Grew up in southern Ontario. Did my first driving of the family station       >>>>>> wagon while going skiing at about age 14.       >>>>>       >>>>> And I should believe that why?       >>>>       >>>> I don't care whether you believe it.       >>>       >>> Translation: I lied.       >>>>       >>>>>>       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>> Basic physics, doofus.       >>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>> Why can't we reach absolute zero? Basic physics idiot.       >>>>>>>> Utterly irrelevant and a lame deflection.       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>> So you don't know basic physics.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> I know far MORE than basic physics, and that's why I know your mention       >>>>>> of "absolute zero" is a deflection.       >>>>>       >>>>> More proof you don't know shit.       >>>>       >>>> So explain the relevance of mentioning it in this context.       >>>       >>> Just to show you talk about physics yet you don't know       >>> shit about it.       >>       >> But it failed to show that, so...       >       > That you don't know shit about it? I agree.       >>       >>>>       >>>>>>       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>> Draw a free body diagram that shows the forces that would cause the       >>>>>>>> vehicle to move forward when the driven wheels are steered to the       right.       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>> Rear wheeled vehicles can do that.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> You mean "rear wheel DRIVE vehicles" and this wasn't that.       >>>>>       >>>>> How do you know?       >>>>       >>>> I looked up what vehicle she was driving.       >>>>       >>>> You could have too.. ...if you'd been bright enough.       >>>       >>> Prove it. You really are obsessed with this shit huh?       >>       >> Google "Renee good vehicle".       >>       >> Read the Wikipedia article.       >>       >> Done.       >       > Wikipedia = LOL              There are sources AT wikipedia, doofus.              >>       >>>>       >>>>>>       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>> To you even know what a "free body diagram" is?       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>> You had to Google it.       >>>>>> How would I have even KNOWN to Google that term? Every accusation an       >>>>>> admission.       >>>>>       >>>>> For the left? Why you're right .       >>>>>>       >>>>>> Actually, I learned in high school physics; admittedly a class       >>>>>> equivalent to AP physics.       >>>>>       >>>>>       >>>>> You most likely flunked any class that really mattered.       >>>> LOL. Your every accusation is an admission.       >>>       >>> Nothing original? Got to copy us now?       >> Who is "us"?       >       > Answer the question.       After you clarify, sure.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca