Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    can.politics    |    Libs bitching about what they voted for    |    997,123 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 996,466 of 997,123    |
|    Skeeter to All    |
|    Re: I Knew Alan Baker Would Be A Faggot.    |
|    19 Jan 26 15:35:22    |
      XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump       From: invalid@none.com              In article <10km9n6$nduj$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com       says...       >       > On 2026-01-18 16:26, Skeeter wrote:       > > In article <10kjrbp$3rq66$13@dont-email.me>, nuh-       > > uh@nope.com says...       > >>       > >> On 2026-01-18 15:42, Skeeter wrote:       > >>> In article <10kjpg8$3rq8m$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-       > >>> uh@nope.com says...       > >>>>       > >>>> On 2026-01-18 08:42, Skeeter wrote:       > >>>>> In article <10khf9o$2tnfv$13@dont-email.me>, nuh-       > >>>>> uh@nope.com says...       > >>>>>>       > >>>>>> On 2026-01-17 15:58, Skeeter wrote:       > >>>>>>> In article <10kh3jg$2tnfv$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-       > >>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...       > >>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 20:46, Skeeter wrote:       > >>>>>>>>> In article <10kf2gb$28hf2$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-       > >>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...       > >>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 19:44, Skeeter wrote:       > >>>>>>>>>>> In article <10kes86$26qks$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-       > >>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...       > >>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 18:14, Skeeter wrote:       > >>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <10keiop$23gth$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-       > >>>>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 09:24, AlleyCat wrote:       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ... and say this.       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 14:34:23 -0800, Alan says...       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Road?       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/OC9smu9.mp4       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/Lfbiqwg.jpeg       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> See those people standing thar, stoopit? WHAT are they       standing on?       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Were any of those people in the direction she intended to       travel?       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure they were.       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How do YOU know where Good was "intending to travel"?       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You don't.       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was making an illustrative point. YOU moved the goalposts,       as usual, with       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your fallacy of the specific.       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> She could have gone down the street MADE A 3-POINT TURN and       came back at the       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> officers, them, having to draw the weapons again and shoot       her again.       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So by pretending you know her intent was to run over an       "officer"...       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Well you seem to be able to read minds you tell us.       > >>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>> So when he states her intent he's NOT reading minds?       > >>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>> BUTWHATABOUT!       > >>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...you then pretend they need to protect against future       "attacks".       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> She was turning away from the officer, doofus.       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On a one way street on a very icy road. No telling what       > >>>>>>>>>>>>> could happen.       > >>>>>>>>>>>> Actually there is "telling" that the car could not have gone to       its left       > >>>>>>>>>>>> with the wheels turned right.       > >>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>> But it went straight.       > >>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>> No, it most certainly did not. COULD not have with the wheels       turned all       > >>>>>>>>>> the way to the right.       > >>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>> But it did. Ice is crazy stuff.       > >>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>> Ice cannot make a car with driven wheels turned to the right move       > >>>>>>>> straight ahead from a stop.       > >>>>>>>       > >>>>>>> You never drove on ice.       > >>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>> Basic physics, doofus.       > >>>>>>>       > >>>>>>> Why can't we reach absolute zero? Basic physics idiot.       > >>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>> And regardless, it shows her intent.       > >>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>> Which was to make a U Turn on a one way street and ICE       > >>>>>>>>>>> just happened to be there. Yea that will sell a jury.       > >>>>>>>>>> I suspect the reason she wanted to turn around was that ICE was       present       > >>>>>>>>>> and she wanted to get out of there.       > >>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>> She was there because she knew who they were. That is       > >>>>>>>>> settled.       > >>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>> By what source?       > >>>>>>>       > >>>>>>> By the fact they had uniforms and shit. You really are       > >>>>>>> this stupid.       > >>>>>>       > >>>>>> That answers the "who they were" part...       > >>>>>       > >>>>> They knew.       > >>>>>>       > >>>>>> ...but not the "she was there BECAUSE" part.       > >>>>>       > >>>>> It will in court.       > >>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>> Why didn't she just keep going?       > >>>>>>>> The street was being occupied by ICE agents.       > >>>>>>>       > >>>>>>> Nope, she could have gone on. She knew the agents were       > >>>>>>> there so why did she go anyway?       > >>>>>> Yup. The videos show the many ICE vehicles there.       > >>>>>       > >>>>> But yo said she didn't know who they were.       > >>>>>       > >>>>>       > >>>>       > >>>> No. In one post, I called the ICE agent "the man" as a generic term.       > >>>       > >>> No in many posts you suggested that she was lost or didn't       > >>> know where she was. You also claimed that she didn't know       > >>> they were ICE.       > >>       > >> Nope. I never suggested she was lost.       > >       > > You did.       >       > Then you'll have no trouble quoting me!              You did.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca