Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    can.politics    |    Libs bitching about what they voted for    |    997,123 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 996,473 of 997,123    |
|    Skeeter to All    |
|    Re: I Knew Alan Baker Would Be A Faggot.    |
|    19 Jan 26 15:41:14    |
      XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump       From: invalid@none.com              In article <10kma5n$nduj$10@dont-email.me>, nuh-       uh@nope.com says...       >       > On 2026-01-18 16:48, Skeeter wrote:       > > In article <10kjsu0$3rq66$33@dont-email.me>, nuh-       > > uh@nope.com says...       > >>       > >> On 2026-01-18 16:08, Skeeter wrote:       > >>> In article <10kjr9t$3rq66$12@dont-email.me>, nuh-       > >>> uh@nope.com says...       > >>>>       > >>>> On 2026-01-18 15:41, Skeeter wrote:       > >>>>> In article <10kjpf4$3rq8m$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-       > >>>>> uh@nope.com says...       > >>>>>>       > >>>>>> On 2026-01-18 08:43, Skeeter wrote:       > >>>>>>> In article <10khfcc$2tnfv$14@dont-email.me>, nuh-       > >>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...       > >>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-17 15:58, Skeeter wrote:       > >>>>>>>>> In article <10kh3jg$2tnfv$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-       > >>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...       > >>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 20:46, Skeeter wrote:       > >>>>>>>>>>> In article <10kf2gb$28hf2$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-       > >>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...       > >>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 19:44, Skeeter wrote:       > >>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <10kes86$26qks$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-       > >>>>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 18:14, Skeeter wrote:       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <10keiop$23gth$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 09:24, AlleyCat wrote:       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ... and say this.       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 14:34:23 -0800, Alan says...       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Road?       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/OC9smu9.mp4       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/Lfbiqwg.jpeg       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> See those people standing thar, stoopit? WHAT are they       standing on?       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Were any of those people in the direction she intended to       travel?       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure they were.       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How do YOU know where Good was "intending to travel"?       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You don't.       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was making an illustrative point. YOU moved the       goalposts, as usual, with       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your fallacy of the specific.       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> She could have gone down the street MADE A 3-POINT TURN       and came back at the       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> officers, them, having to draw the weapons again and shoot       her again.       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So by pretending you know her intent was to run over an       "officer"...       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well you seem to be able to read minds you tell us.       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So when he states her intent he's NOT reading minds?       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>> BUTWHATABOUT!       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...you then pretend they need to protect against future       "attacks".       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> She was turning away from the officer, doofus.       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On a one way street on a very icy road. No telling what       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could happen.       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Actually there is "telling" that the car could not have gone       to its left       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> with the wheels turned right.       > >>>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>>> But it went straight.       > >>>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>>> No, it most certainly did not. COULD not have with the wheels       turned all       > >>>>>>>>>>>> the way to the right.       > >>>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>> But it did. Ice is crazy stuff.       > >>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>> Ice cannot make a car with driven wheels turned to the right move       > >>>>>>>>>> straight ahead from a stop.       > >>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>> You never drove on ice.       > >>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>> I've driven on ice since I learned to drive.       > >>>>>>>       > >>>>>>> Liar.       > >>>>>>       > >>>>>> Grew up in southern Ontario. Did my first driving of the family       station       > >>>>>> wagon while going skiing at about age 14.       > >>>>>       > >>>>> And I should believe that why?       > >>>>       > >>>> I don't care whether you believe it.       > >>>       > >>> Translation: I lied.       > >>>>       > >>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>>> Basic physics, doofus.       > >>>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>> Why can't we reach absolute zero? Basic physics idiot.       > >>>>>>>> Utterly irrelevant and a lame deflection.       > >>>>>>>       > >>>>>>> So you don't know basic physics.       > >>>>>>       > >>>>>> I know far MORE than basic physics, and that's why I know your mention       > >>>>>> of "absolute zero" is a deflection.       > >>>>>       > >>>>> More proof you don't know shit.       > >>>>       > >>>> So explain the relevance of mentioning it in this context.       > >>>       > >>> Just to show you talk about physics yet you don't know       > >>> shit about it.       > >>       > >> But it failed to show that, so...       > >       > > That you don't know shit about it? I agree.       > >>       > >>>>       > >>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>> Draw a free body diagram that shows the forces that would cause the       > >>>>>>>> vehicle to move forward when the driven wheels are steered to the       right.       > >>>>>>>       > >>>>>>> Rear wheeled vehicles can do that.       > >>>>>>       > >>>>>> You mean "rear wheel DRIVE vehicles" and this wasn't that.       > >>>>>       > >>>>> How do you know?       > >>>>       > >>>> I looked up what vehicle she was driving.       > >>>>       > >>>> You could have too.. ...if you'd been bright enough.       > >>>       > >>> Prove it. You really are obsessed with this shit huh?       > >>       > >> Google "Renee good vehicle".       > >>       > >> Read the Wikipedia article.       > >>       > >> Done.       > >       > > Wikipedia = LOL       >       > There are sources AT wikipedia, doofus.              That can be changed and edited.       >       > >>       > >>>>       > >>>>>>       > >>>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>> To you even know what a "free body diagram" is?       > >>>>>>>       > >>>>>>> You had to Google it.       > >>>>>> How would I have even KNOWN to Google that term? Every accusation an       > >>>>>> admission.       > >>>>>       > >>>>> For the left? Why you're right .       > >>>>>>       > >>>>>> Actually, I learned in high school physics; admittedly a class       > >>>>>> equivalent to AP physics.       > >>>>>       > >>>>>       > >>>>> You most likely flunked any class that really mattered.       > >>>> LOL. Your every accusation is an admission.       > >>>       > >>> Nothing original? Got to copy us now?       > >> Who is "us"?       > >       > > Answer the question.       > After you clarify, sure.              I asked first. You are failing again.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca