XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: nuh-uh@nope.com   
      
   On 2026-01-19 14:35, Skeeter wrote:   
   > In article <10km9i9$nduj$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com   
   > says...   
   >>   
   >> On 2026-01-19 04:25, NoBody wrote:   
   >>> On Sun, 18 Jan 2026 15:16:03 -0800, Alan  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On 2026-01-18 04:39, AlleyCat wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 15:47:25 -0800,  Alan says...   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> On 2026-01-16 09:24, AlleyCat wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 16:07:58 -0700,  Skeeter says...   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> She was a citizen attempting to turn around and depart the area.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> You read minds now?   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> He's always thought he could read minds.   
   >>>>>> I don't need to read minds.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> The "officer's" own cellphone video shows her turning hard to her   
   right...   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> ...and running RIGHT into him, hard.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Nope. It shows the phone suddenly moving, but that proves nothing.   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>> There are other videos that showed what happened.  Why are there only   
   >>> two idiots here who can't admit she hit the agent?   
   >>   
   >> Why can't you show a single example where the actual contact is shown?   
   >   
   > Why are you inclined to defend a domestic terrorist?   
      
   Bootstrapping.   
      
   You can only call her a "terrorist" by claiming she acted with malicious   
   intent, and then you can claim she had malicious intent because she was   
   a "terrorist"   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)