Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
| can.politics | Libs bitching about what they voted for | 997,123 messages |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
| Message 996,475 of 997,123 |
| Alan to Skeeter |
| Re: I Knew Alan Baker Would Be A Faggot. |
| 19 Jan 26 14:41:09 |
XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump From: nuh-uh@nope.com On 2026-01-19 14:35, Skeeter wrote: > In article <10km9n6$nduj$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com > says... >> >> On 2026-01-18 16:26, Skeeter wrote: >>> In article <10kjrbp$3rq66$13@dont-email.me>, nuh- >>> uh@nope.com says... >>>> >>>> On 2026-01-18 15:42, Skeeter wrote: >>>>> In article <10kjpg8$3rq8m$5@dont-email.me>, nuh- >>>>> uh@nope.com says... >>>>>> >>>>>> On 2026-01-18 08:42, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>> In article <10khf9o$2tnfv$13@dont-email.me>, nuh- >>>>>>> uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-17 15:58, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>> In article <10kh3jg$2tnfv$4@dont-email.me>, nuh- >>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 20:46, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> In article <10kf2gb$28hf2$5@dont-email.me>, nuh- >>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 19:44, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <10kes86$26qks$5@dont-email.me>, nuh- >>>>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 18:14, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <10keiop$23gth$3@dont-email.me>, nuh- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 09:24, AlleyCat wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ... and say this. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 14:34:23 -0800, Alan says... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Road? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/OC9smu9.mp4 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/Lfbiqwg.jpeg >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> See those people standing thar, stoopit? WHAT are they standing on? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Were any of those people in the direction she intended to travel? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure they were. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How do YOU know where Good was "intending to travel"? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You don't. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was making an illustrative point. YOU moved the goalposts, as usual, with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your fallacy of the specific. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> She could have gone down the street MADE A 3-POINT TURN and came back at the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> officers, them, having to draw the weapons again and shoot her again. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So by pretending you know her intent was to run over an "officer"... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well you seem to be able to read minds you tell us. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So when he states her intent he's NOT reading minds? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> BUTWHATABOUT! >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...you then pretend they need to protect against future "attacks". >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> She was turning away from the officer, doofus. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On a one way street on a very icy road. No telling what >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could happen. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Actually there is "telling" that the car could not have gone to its left >>>>>>>>>>>>>> with the wheels turned right. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> But it went straight. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> No, it most certainly did not. COULD not have with the wheels turned all >>>>>>>>>>>> the way to the right. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> But it did. Ice is crazy stuff. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Ice cannot make a car with driven wheels turned to the right move >>>>>>>>>> straight ahead from a stop. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You never drove on ice. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Basic physics, doofus. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Why can't we reach absolute zero? Basic physics idiot. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> And regardless, it shows her intent. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Which was to make a U Turn on a one way street and ICE >>>>>>>>>>>>> just happened to be there. Yea that will sell a jury. >>>>>>>>>>>> I suspect the reason she wanted to turn around was that ICE was present >>>>>>>>>>>> and she wanted to get out of there. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> She was there because she knew who they were. That is >>>>>>>>>>> settled. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> By what source? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> By the fact they had uniforms and shit. You really are >>>>>>>>> this stupid. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> That answers the "who they were" part... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> They knew. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ...but not the "she was there BECAUSE" part. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It will in court. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Why didn't she just keep going? >>>>>>>>>> The street was being occupied by ICE agents. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Nope, she could have gone on. She knew the agents were >>>>>>>>> there so why did she go anyway? >>>>>>>> Yup. The videos show the many ICE vehicles there. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> But yo said she didn't know who they were. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> No. In one post, I called the ICE agent "the man" as a generic term. >>>>> >>>>> No in many posts you suggested that she was lost or didn't >>>>> know where she was. You also claimed that she didn't know >>>>> they were ICE. >>>> >>>> Nope. I never suggested she was lost. >>> >>> You did. >> >> Then you'll have no trouble quoting me! > > You did. So quote me. --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2) |
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca