XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: nuh-uh@nope.com   
      
   On 2026-01-19 14:37, Skeeter wrote:   
   > In article <10km9vf$nduj$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com   
   > says...   
   >>   
   >> On 2026-01-18 16:40, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>> In article <10kjrpd$3rq66$16@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>   
   >>>> On 2026-01-18 15:50, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>> In article <10kjpsr$3rq66$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> On 2026-01-17 15:37, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>>>> In article <10kh33k$2tn8q$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-15 16:27, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> In article <10kbuvv$15km6$25@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-15 15:45, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> In article <10kbr1f$15km4$9@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-14 22:58, AlleyCat wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 14 Jan 2026 17:09:09 -0800,  Alan says...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In order to complete a three-point turn and leave the area.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> Deflection.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> She was parked.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> If she'd been "parked" then her vehicle would have been   
   stationary.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> And not sideways in the road.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> The video shows her in the middle of turning around.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Why was she turning around? She could have just drove on.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Already explained to you.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> It was a one way street and she knew that.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> You don't know what she knew or when she knew it.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> But you seem to. Interesting.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Nope. I've only pointed out what she DID>   
   >>>   
   >>> You want us to think that you know what she and he were   
   >>> thinking.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Anyway the cars wer all pointed in one direction for one.   
   >>>>> If she didn't know it was a one way street then she   
   >>>>> shouldn't be driving.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> People make mistakes when they're stressed.   
   >>>   
   >>> What was she stressed about?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> That's hardly a reason to take away a driver's license.   
   >>>   
   >>> Welcome to America.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> What I know:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> '2. Firearms may not be discharged solely to disable moving vehicles.   
   >>>>>> Specifically, firearms may not be discharged at a moving vehicle unless:   
   >>>>>> (1) a person in the vehicle is threatening the officer or another person   
   >>>>>> with deadly force by means other than the vehicle; or (2) the vehicle is   
   >>>>>> operated in a manner that threatens to cause death or serious physical   
   >>>>>> injury to the officer or others, and no other objectively reasonable   
   >>>>>> means of defense appear to exist, which includes moving out of the path   
   >>>>>> of the vehicle.'   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Read that last part until you get it:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> 'and no other objectively reasonable means of defense appear to exist,   
   >>>>>> which includes moving out of the path of the vehicle.'   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Never get you through a trial. You need more.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Trial of whom?   
   >>>   
   >>> You know the left is going to bury Ross. There will be a   
   >>> trial and your "policies" bullshit will be a weak defense.   
   >>   
   >> If Ross is so innocent, why is the federal government refusing to show   
   >> all the evidence?   
      
   No answer?   
      
   Running away?   
      
   >>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Ross MANUFACTURED a situation where he could draw his weapon.   
   >>>   
   >>> So you could read his mind?   
   >>   
   >> In this case, I'm reading his ACTIONS.   
   >   
   > You never saw that.   
   >>   
      
   I saw him walking and then stop when a single additional step would have   
   avoided any possibility of contact between him and the vehicle.   
      
      
   >>>>   
   >>>> The policy explicitly states that you can't fire on a vehicle to prevent   
   >>>> it from fleeing.   
   >>>   
   >>> POLICIES!!!!!   
   >> Yes. And he violated at least two parts of it.   
   >   
   > Never hold up in court. Self defense will.   
   Not when he had a duty to take reasonable actions to prevent there being   
   any possible threat.   
      
   But let's put all the evidence out there and put it in a court of law.   
      
   Do you think the DoJ will do that?   
      
   Do you think they'll block local law enforcement from investigating?   
      
   Oh, right! They already ARE blocking them.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)