XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: invalid@none.com   
      
   In article <10kmbtj$n7db$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com   
   says...   
   >   
   > On 2026-01-19 14:35, Skeeter wrote:   
   > > In article <10km9i9$nduj$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com   
   > > says...   
   > >>   
   > >> On 2026-01-19 04:25, NoBody wrote:   
   > >>> On Sun, 18 Jan 2026 15:16:03 -0800, Alan  wrote:   
   > >>>   
   > >>>> On 2026-01-18 04:39, AlleyCat wrote:   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 15:47:25 -0800,  Alan says...   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> On 2026-01-16 09:24, AlleyCat wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 16:07:58 -0700,  Skeeter says...   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> She was a citizen attempting to turn around and depart the area.   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> You read minds now?   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> He's always thought he could read minds.   
   > >>>>>> I don't need to read minds.   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> The "officer's" own cellphone video shows her turning hard to her   
   right...   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> ...and running RIGHT into him, hard.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> Nope. It shows the phone suddenly moving, but that proves nothing.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>   
   > >>> There are other videos that showed what happened.  Why are there only   
   > >>> two idiots here who can't admit she hit the agent?   
   > >>   
   > >> Why can't you show a single example where the actual contact is shown?   
   > >   
   > > Why are you inclined to defend a domestic terrorist?   
   >   
   > Bootstrapping.   
   >   
   > You can only call her a "terrorist" by claiming she acted with malicious   
   > intent, and then you can claim she had malicious intent because she was   
   > a "terrorist"   
      
      
   Her wife showed malicious intent. We been through this   
   already.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)