XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: invalid@none.com   
      
   In article <10kmbrl$n7db$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com   
   says...   
   >   
   > On 2026-01-19 14:34, Skeeter wrote:   
   > > In article <10km9h9$nduj$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com   
   > > says...   
   > >>   
   > >> On 2026-01-18 17:18, AlleyCat wrote:   
   > >>>   
   > >>> On Sun, 18 Jan 2026 15:16:03 -0800,  Alan says...   
   > >>>   
   > >>>>    the vehicle is   
   > >>>> operated in a manner THAT THREATENS TO CAUSE DEATH OR SERIOUS PHYSICAL   
   > >>>> INJURY TO THE OFFICER OR OTHERS, and no other objectively reasonable   
   > >>>> means of defense appear to exist   
   > >>>   
   > >>> Bang bang, she dead... fitty bullets in her head.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> The people are tired of these left-wing kook insurrectionists. If she   
   had to   
   > >>> be martyred to show that we're fed up... so be it.   
   > >>   
   > >> So you're now admitting this was never about self-defense.   
   > >>   
   > >> Got it.   
   > >   
   > > He never admitted it you liar.   
   >   
   > That's the implication of his statement.   
   >   
   > >>   
   > >>>   
   > >>> If you fuckers can shoot, we can shoot back.   
   > >>   
   > >> She didn't shoot anyone.   
   > >   
   > > No, she decided to run him over instead. Besides mentally   
   > > ill people can't own guns.   
   > Her actions show that was not her intent.   
      
   They do. Your excuses have no substance.   
   >   
   > If she had wanted to run him over, she wouldn't have been turning the   
   > wheel as far to the right as it could go.   
      
      
   How do you know that was as far as it could go?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)