XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: invalid@none.com   
      
   In article <10kmc4v$nduj$12@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   uh@nope.com says...   
   >   
   > On 2026-01-19 14:37, Skeeter wrote:   
   > > In article <10km9vf$nduj$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com   
   > > says...   
   > >>   
   > >> On 2026-01-18 16:40, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>> In article <10kjrpd$3rq66$16@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > >>> uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> On 2026-01-18 15:50, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>>>> In article <10kjpsr$3rq66$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > >>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> On 2026-01-17 15:37, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>>>>>> In article <10kh33k$2tn8q$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > >>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-15 16:27, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>> In article <10kbuvv$15km6$25@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > >>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-15 15:45, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> In article <10kbr1f$15km4$9@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-14 22:58, AlleyCat wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 14 Jan 2026 17:09:09 -0800,  Alan says...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In order to complete a three-point turn and leave the area.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Deflection.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> She was parked.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> If she'd been "parked" then her vehicle would have been   
   stationary.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> And not sideways in the road.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>> The video shows her in the middle of turning around.   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> Why was she turning around? She could have just drove on.   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> Already explained to you.   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> It was a one way street and she knew that.   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> You don't know what she knew or when she knew it.   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> But you seem to. Interesting.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> Nope. I've only pointed out what she DID>   
   > >>>   
   > >>> You want us to think that you know what she and he were   
   > >>> thinking.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> Anyway the cars wer all pointed in one direction for one.   
   > >>>>> If she didn't know it was a one way street then she   
   > >>>>> shouldn't be driving.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> People make mistakes when they're stressed.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> What was she stressed about?   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> That's hardly a reason to take away a driver's license.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> Welcome to America.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> What I know:   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> '2. Firearms may not be discharged solely to disable moving vehicles.   
   > >>>>>> Specifically, firearms may not be discharged at a moving vehicle   
   unless:   
   > >>>>>> (1) a person in the vehicle is threatening the officer or another   
   person   
   > >>>>>> with deadly force by means other than the vehicle; or (2) the vehicle   
   is   
   > >>>>>> operated in a manner that threatens to cause death or serious physical   
   > >>>>>> injury to the officer or others, and no other objectively reasonable   
   > >>>>>> means of defense appear to exist, which includes moving out of the   
   path   
   > >>>>>> of the vehicle.'   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> Read that last part until you get it:   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> 'and no other objectively reasonable means of defense appear to exist,   
   > >>>>>> which includes moving out of the path of the vehicle.'   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> Never get you through a trial. You need more.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> Trial of whom?   
   > >>>   
   > >>> You know the left is going to bury Ross. There will be a   
   > >>> trial and your "policies" bullshit will be a weak defense.   
   > >>   
   > >> If Ross is so innocent, why is the federal government refusing to show   
   > >> all the evidence?   
   >   
   > No answer?   
   >   
   > Running away?   
      
   You don't show "ALL" evidence during an active   
   investigation. I don't know how they do it up there in   
   KKKanada.   
   >   
   > >>   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> Ross MANUFACTURED a situation where he could draw his weapon.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> So you could read his mind?   
   > >>   
   > >> In this case, I'm reading his ACTIONS.   
   > >   
   > > You never saw that.   
   > >>   
   >   
   > I saw him walking and then stop when a single additional step would have   
   > avoided any possibility of contact between him and the vehicle.   
      
   Still won't hold in court.   
   >   
   >   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> The policy explicitly states that you can't fire on a vehicle to prevent   
   > >>>> it from fleeing.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> POLICIES!!!!!   
   > >> Yes. And he violated at least two parts of it.   
   > >   
   > > Never hold up in court. Self defense will.   
   > Not when he had a duty to take reasonable actions to prevent there being   
   > any possible threat.   
      
   I explained this already. We don't do court like you   
   canooks do.   
   >   
   > But let's put all the evidence out there and put it in a court of law.   
      
   In time yes.   
   >   
   > Do you think the DoJ will do that?   
      
   When it's time.   
   >   
   > Do you think they'll block local law enforcement from investigating?   
      
   Local law refused to work with them so fuck them.   
   >   
   > Oh, right! They already ARE blocking them.   
      
   See above. Local law there is WOKE and will be biased.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)