XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: invalid@none.com   
      
   In article <10kmbu5$n7db$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com   
   says...   
   >   
   > On 2026-01-19 14:35, Skeeter wrote:   
   > > In article <10km9n6$nduj$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com   
   > > says...   
   > >>   
   > >> On 2026-01-18 16:26, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>> In article <10kjrbp$3rq66$13@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > >>> uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> On 2026-01-18 15:42, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>>>> In article <10kjpg8$3rq8m$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > >>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> On 2026-01-18 08:42, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>>>>>> In article <10khf9o$2tnfv$13@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > >>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-17 15:58, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>> In article <10kh3jg$2tnfv$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > >>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 20:46, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> In article <10kf2gb$28hf2$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 19:44, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <10kes86$26qks$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 18:14, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <10keiop$23gth$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 09:24, AlleyCat wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ... and say this.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 14:34:23 -0800,  Alan says...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Road?   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/OC9smu9.mp4   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/Lfbiqwg.jpeg   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> See those people standing thar, stoopit? WHAT are they   
   standing on?   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Were any of those people in the direction she intended to   
   travel?   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure they were.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How do YOU know where Good was "intending to travel"?   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You don't.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was making an illustrative point. YOU moved the   
   goalposts, as usual, with   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your fallacy of the specific.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> She could have gone down the street MADE A 3-POINT TURN   
   and came back at the   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> officers, them, having to draw the weapons again and shoot   
   her again.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So by pretending you know her intent was to run over an   
   "officer"...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well you seem to be able to read minds you tell us.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So when he states her intent he's NOT reading minds?   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> BUTWHATABOUT!   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...you then pretend they need to protect against future   
   "attacks".   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> She was turning away from the officer, doofus.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On a one way street on a very icy road. No telling what   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could happen.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Actually there is "telling" that the car could not have gone   
   to its left   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> with the wheels turned right.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> But it went straight.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> No, it most certainly did not. COULD not have with the wheels   
   turned all   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> the way to the right.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> But it did. Ice is crazy stuff.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>> Ice cannot make a car with driven wheels turned to the right move   
   > >>>>>>>>>> straight ahead from a stop.   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> You never drove on ice.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>> Basic physics, doofus.   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> Why can't we reach absolute zero? Basic physics idiot.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> And regardless, it shows her intent.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Which was to make a U Turn on a one way street and ICE   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> just happened to be there. Yea that will sell a jury.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> I suspect the reason she wanted to turn around was that ICE was   
   present   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> and she wanted to get out of there.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> She was there because she knew who they were. That is   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> settled.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>> By what source?   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> By the fact they had uniforms and shit. You really are   
   > >>>>>>>>> this stupid.   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> That answers the "who they were" part...   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> They knew.   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> ...but not the "she was there BECAUSE" part.   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> It will in court.   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> Why didn't she just keep going?   
   > >>>>>>>>>> The street was being occupied by ICE agents.   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> Nope, she could have gone on. She knew the agents were   
   > >>>>>>>>> there so why did she go anyway?   
   > >>>>>>>> Yup. The videos show the many ICE vehicles there.   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> But yo said she didn't know who they were.   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> No. In one post, I called the ICE agent "the man" as a generic term.   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> No in many posts you suggested that she was lost or didn't   
   > >>>>> know where she was. You also claimed that she didn't know   
   > >>>>> they were ICE.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> Nope. I never suggested she was lost.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> You did.   
   > >>   
   > >> Then you'll have no trouble quoting me!   
   > >   
   > > You did.   
   >   
   > So quote me.   
      
   You lie and spin and ignore to much for me to bother.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)