home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   can.politics      Libs bitching about what they voted for      997,123 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 996,488 of 997,123   
   Alan to Skeeter   
   Re: I Knew Alan Baker Would Be A Faggot.   
   19 Jan 26 14:51:27   
   
   XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: nuh-uh@nope.com   
      
   On 2026-01-19 14:41, Skeeter wrote:   
   > In article <10kma5n$nduj$10@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > uh@nope.com says...   
   >>   
   >> On 2026-01-18 16:48, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>> In article <10kjsu0$3rq66$33@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>   
   >>>> On 2026-01-18 16:08, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>> In article <10kjr9t$3rq66$12@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> On 2026-01-18 15:41, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>>>> In article <10kjpf4$3rq8m$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-18 08:43, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> In article <10khfcc$2tnfv$14@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-17 15:58, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> In article <10kh3jg$2tnfv$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 20:46, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <10kf2gb$28hf2$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 19:44, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <10kes86$26qks$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 18:14, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <10keiop$23gth$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 09:24, AlleyCat wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ... and say this.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 14:34:23 -0800,  Alan says...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Road?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/OC9smu9.mp4   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/Lfbiqwg.jpeg   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> See those people standing thar, stoopit? WHAT are they   
   standing on?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Were any of those people in the direction she intended to   
   travel?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure they were.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How do YOU know where Good was "intending to travel"?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You don't.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was making an illustrative point. YOU moved the   
   goalposts, as usual, with   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your fallacy of the specific.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> She could have gone down the street MADE A 3-POINT TURN   
   and came back at the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> officers, them, having to draw the weapons again and shoot   
   her again.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So by pretending you know her intent was to run over an   
   "officer"...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well you seem to be able to read minds you tell us.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So when he states her intent he's NOT reading minds?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BUTWHATABOUT!   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...you then pretend they need to protect against future   
   "attacks".   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> She was turning away from the officer, doofus.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On a one way street on a very icy road. No telling what   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could happen.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Actually there is "telling" that the car could not have gone   
   to its left   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with the wheels turned right.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But it went straight.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, it most certainly did not. COULD not have with the wheels   
   turned all   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the way to the right.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> But it did. Ice is crazy stuff.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Ice cannot make a car with driven wheels turned to the right move   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> straight ahead from a stop.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> You never drove on ice.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> I've driven on ice since I learned  to drive.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Liar.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Grew up in southern Ontario. Did my first driving of the family   
   station   
   >>>>>>>> wagon while going skiing at about age 14.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> And I should believe that why?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> I don't care whether you believe it.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Translation: I lied.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Basic physics, doofus.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Why can't we reach absolute zero? Basic physics idiot.   
   >>>>>>>>>> Utterly irrelevant and a lame deflection.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> So you don't know basic physics.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> I know far MORE than basic physics, and that's why I know your mention   
   >>>>>>>> of "absolute zero" is a deflection.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> More proof you don't know shit.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> So explain the relevance of mentioning it in this context.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Just to show you talk about physics yet you don't know   
   >>>>> shit about it.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> But it failed to show that, so...   
   >>>   
   >>> That you don't know shit about it? I agree.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Draw a free body diagram that shows the forces that would cause the   
   >>>>>>>>>> vehicle to move forward when the driven wheels are steered to the   
   right.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Rear wheeled vehicles can do that.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> You mean "rear wheel DRIVE vehicles" and this wasn't that.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> How do you know?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> I looked up what vehicle she was driving.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> You could have too.. ...if you'd been bright enough.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Prove it. You really are obsessed with this shit huh?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Google "Renee good vehicle".   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Read the Wikipedia article.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Done.   
   >>>   
   >>> Wikipedia = LOL   
   >>   
   >> There are sources AT wikipedia, doofus.   
   >   
   > That can be changed and edited.   
      
      
      
   Dude, this is utterly stupid of you.   
      
   Everyone can see in the videos and in the images taken after the crash,   
   that Renee Good's vehicle was a Honda.   
      
   Honda doesn't make any RWD cars currently, and the RWD cars they did   
   make in the past (S2000, NSX) could never be mistaken for the Honda   
   Pilot SUV that Renee Good was driving.   
      
   I mean, it's obvious you're not very bright, but you don't have to   
   highlight it ALL the time.   
      
   >>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> To you even know what a "free body diagram" is?   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> You had to Google it.   
   >>>>>>>> How would I have even KNOWN to Google that term? Every accusation an   
   >>>>>>>> admission.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> For the left? Why you're right .   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Actually, I learned in high school physics; admittedly a class   
   >>>>>>>> equivalent to AP physics.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> You most likely flunked any class that really mattered.   
   >>>>>> LOL. Your every accusation is an admission.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Nothing original? Got to copy us now?   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca