XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: nuh-uh@nope.com   
      
   On 2026-01-19 14:44, Skeeter wrote:   
   > In article <10kma28$nduj$8@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com   
   > says...   
   >>   
   >> On 2026-01-18 16:44, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>> In article <10kjs1l$3rq66$22@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>   
   >>>> On 2026-01-16 20:55, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>> In article <10kf352$28hf2$8@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> On 2026-01-16 20:14, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>>>> In article <10keu4p$27aph$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 18:53, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> In article <10kemhj$24cdg$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 16:38, Socialism is for losers wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> The car sure jerked ahead as it hit him.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Nope. The "officer" might have jerked, but there is video taken   
   from   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> outside the car and it moved off in a completely ordinary manner.   
   >>>>>>>>>>> No, it jerked ahead.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> There is a video that shows it did not.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> And there are more that show it did.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> So produce a link to one.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Run away!   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> And you haven't addressed that she was clearly steering away from   
   him...   
   >>>>>>>>>>> ...and yet she hit him.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> ...which she wouldn't have been doing if she was "weaponizing her   
   car".   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Nonsense. She had to have known that she'd hit him. She just didn't   
   >>>>>>>>>>> expect that he'd be ready with a gun.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> On the contrary.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> He was clearly moving as she began to back and turn her wheel left.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> On a one way street.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Then he CHOOSES to stop in front of the left corner of her car and   
   draw   
   >>>>>>>>>> his weapon when one more step to his right would have put him out   
   of any   
   >>>>>>>>>> danger being struck.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Her intent to simply leave can be inferred from the fact that she   
   was   
   >>>>>>>>>> turning away from him. His own cellphone video shows it.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Why was she there?   
   >>>>>>>> She was returning home after dropping her child at school.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> But you said she wasn't familiar with the street. You shot   
   >>>>> yourself in the foot again.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> I never said that. I said that in a high stress situation, she tried to   
   >>>> turn around to drive back in the direction she'd come before realizing   
   >>>> that she was on a one way street.   
   >>>   
   >>> She should have already known it was a one way street. Why   
   >>> didn't she just keep driving?   
   >>   
   >> Because it was a high stress situation and she at first thought turning   
   >> around was the better choice.   
   >   
   >   
   > How do you know that is what she was thinking? She caused   
   > the situation which brings me to court. They will say he   
   > was in a high stress situation and the policies argument   
   > will go out the window.   
   >   
      
   Nope. Because that is why policies and training exist in the first place.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)