XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump
From: nuh-uh@nope.com
On 2026-01-19 14:48, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <10kmbtj$n7db$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
> says...
>>
>> On 2026-01-19 14:35, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <10km9i9$nduj$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
>>> says...
>>>>
>>>> On 2026-01-19 04:25, NoBody wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 18 Jan 2026 15:16:03 -0800, Alan wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2026-01-18 04:39, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 15:47:25 -0800, Alan says...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 09:24, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 16:07:58 -0700, Skeeter says...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> She was a citizen attempting to turn around and depart the area.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You read minds now?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> He's always thought he could read minds.
>>>>>>>> I don't need to read minds.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The "officer's" own cellphone video shows her turning hard to her
right...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ...and running RIGHT into him, hard.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nope. It shows the phone suddenly moving, but that proves nothing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> There are other videos that showed what happened. Why are there only
>>>>> two idiots here who can't admit she hit the agent?
>>>>
>>>> Why can't you show a single example where the actual contact is shown?
>>>
>>> Why are you inclined to defend a domestic terrorist?
>>
>> Bootstrapping.
>>
>> You can only call her a "terrorist" by claiming she acted with malicious
>> intent, and then you can claim she had malicious intent because she was
>> a "terrorist"
>
>
> Her wife showed malicious intent. We been through this
> already.
Videoing is "malicious intent" now?
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
