Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    can.politics    |    Libs bitching about what they voted for    |    997,123 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 996,498 of 997,123    |
|    Alan to Skeeter    |
|    Re: Here We Go Again...Desperation Is, A    |
|    19 Jan 26 15:01:42    |
      XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump       From: nuh-uh@nope.com              On 2026-01-19 14:54, Skeeter wrote:       > In article <10kmc75$nduj$13@dont-email.me>, nuh-       > uh@nope.com says...       >>       >> On 2026-01-19 14:38, Skeeter wrote:       >>> In article <10kma0i$nduj$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com       >>> says...       >>>>       >>>> On 2026-01-18 16:41, Skeeter wrote:       >>>>> In article <10kjrqc$3rq66$17@dont-email.me>, nuh-       >>>>> uh@nope.com says...       >>>>>>       >>>>>> On 2026-01-18 15:52, Skeeter wrote:       >>>>>>> In article <10kjpuf$3rq66$8@dont-email.me>, nuh-       >>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-17 15:37, Skeeter wrote:       >>>>>>>>> In article <10kh336$2tn8q$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-       >>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...       >>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-15 16:29, Skeeter wrote:       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> His: tell us of his training. Tell us what HIS training was       when he was about       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be run over by a domestic insurrectionist terrorist, who       was blocking him       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and his fellow federal agents, from performing his/their       duties as ICE agents.       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I thought you'd never ask!       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'Chapter 1: General Guidelines       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WHOSE "guidelines?       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Customs and Border Patrol's "Use of Force Policy".       >>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>> All go out the window when someone is trying to run you       >>>>>>>>>>>>> over.       >>>>>>>>>>>> No. That is exactly when the policy comes into play.       >>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>> Fuck the policy? You are just looking for an excuse to       >>>>>>>>>>> hate.       >>>>>>>>>> The policy exists to protect both law enforcement and citizens.       >>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>> He violated that policy to CREATE a threat.       >>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>> So you do admit it exists.       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>> Admit what: that a policy exists which he violated?       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>> '2. Firearms may not be discharged solely to disable moving vehicles.       >>>>>>>> Specifically, firearms may not be discharged at a moving vehicle       unless:       >>>>>>>> (1) a person in the vehicle is threatening the officer or another       person       >>>>>>>> with deadly force by means other than the vehicle; or (2) the vehicle       is       >>>>>>>> operated in a manner that threatens to cause death or serious physical       >>>>>>>> injury to the officer or others, and no other objectively reasonable       >>>>>>>> means of defense appear to exist, which includes moving out of the       path       >>>>>>>> of the vehicle.'       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>> Read that last part until you get it:       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>> 'and no other objectively reasonable means of defense appear to exist,       >>>>>>>> which includes moving out of the path of the vehicle.'       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>> Admit we don't do court here like you do in commie       >>>>>>> KKKanada. The jury will also look at the things that       >>>>>>> happened and the reaction and realize that he was self       >>>>>>> defending. Happens a lot.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> Not when the see he could simply have stepped out of the way.       >>>>>       >>>>> Nope. Reread what I wrote.       >>>>       >>>> Sure.       >>>>       >>>> Done.       >>>>       >>>> He could still have just kept walking and never been in a position to be       >>>> struck at all.       >>>       >>> And she could have just kept driving and she would be       >>> alive today.       >>       >> She attempted to just drive away...       >       > By making a 3 point turn?              At first, yes.              >>       >> ...and Jonathan Ross decided to stop walking while he was still       >> potentially in her path and was drawing his weapon before the car even       >> started moving forward.       >       > She was impeding them.       You don't get to draw your weapon on someone for "impeding" even if she       was...              ...which is funny because she was waving ICE vehicles past her.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca