XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: nuh-uh@nope.com   
      
   On 2026-01-17 15:59, Skeeter wrote:   
   > In article <10kh3km$2tnfv$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > uh@nope.com says...   
   >>   
   >> On 2026-01-16 20:44, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>> In article <10kf2i4$28hf2$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>   
   >>>> On 2026-01-16 19:42, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>> In article <10kes61$26qks$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> On 2026-01-16 18:12, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>>>> In article <10keimd$23gth$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 09:24, AlleyCat wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 16:07:58 -0700,  Skeeter says...   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> She was a citizen attempting to turn around and depart the area.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> You read minds now?   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> He's always thought he could read minds.   
   >>>>>>>> I don't need to read minds.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> The "officer's" own cellphone video shows her turning hard to her   
   right.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> and him getting hit.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Nope. That doesn't actuall appear in his video...   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> ...but than you for admitting it does show she was turning hard right.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Yet still went forward.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> If you mean straight forward, it most certainly did not.   
   >>>   
   >>> But it did until she flopped out.   
   >>   
   >> After the shooting? How is that relevant?   
   >   
   > She fell against the wheel.   
      
   So the steering wheel wasn't turned to the right...   
      
   ...as you can clearly see in the Jonathan Ross's cellphone video?   
      
   >>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> I never admitted anything cupcake.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> That is the implication of your use of "and" in the sentence fragment   
   >>>> you were attaching to my earlier sentence.   
   >>>   
   >>> I didn't admit anything liar.   
   >> You should learn how English works before you type anything more.   
   >   
   > You should get some real facts before you speak anymore.   
   When someone makes a statement, and someone replies with a sentence   
   fragment beginning with "and", it is implicit that they accept the   
   original statement as true.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)