Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    can.politics    |    Libs bitching about what they voted for    |    997,123 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 996,502 of 997,123    |
|    Alan to Skeeter    |
|    Re: Desperation Is, As Desperation Does    |
|    19 Jan 26 15:09:49    |
      XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump       From: nuh-uh@nope.com              On 2026-01-18 16:49, Skeeter wrote:       > In article <10kjsq7$3rq66$31@dont-email.me>, nuh-       > uh@nope.com says...       >>       >> On 2026-01-18 16:04, Skeeter wrote:       >>> In article <10kjrtg$3rq66$19@dont-email.me>, nuh-       >>> uh@nope.com says...       >>>>       >>>> On 2026-01-17 16:04, Skeeter wrote:       >>>>> In article <10kh2io$2tn8q$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-       >>>>> uh@nope.com says...       >>>>>>       >>>>>> On 2026-01-16 20:31, Skeeter wrote:       >>>>>>> In article <10kf2eh$28hf2$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-       >>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 19:44, Skeeter wrote:       >>>>>>>>> In article <10kerg2$268b0$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-       >>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...       >>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 18:03, Skeeter wrote:       >>>>>>>>>>> In article <10keh5c$23gue$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-       >>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...       >>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 14:25, Skeeter wrote:       >>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <10ke30v$1ui33$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-       >>>>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 04:30, NoBody wrote:       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. Authorized Officers/Agents should avoid intentionally and       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unreasonably placing themselves in positions in which they       have no       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alternative to using deadly force.'       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He did. SHE changed that equation.       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He chose to remain there when a single step to his right       would have       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> taken him out of the danger area.       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Laughter!       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I love how you pretend to be an armchair expert on what could       or could       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not have been done. She weaponized her vehicle and he       perceived a       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> threat to his life and safety. Legit shoot.       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>> If she'd intended to drive into him, she wouldn't have been       turning her       >>>>>>>>>>>>>> steering wheel hard to the right...       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...and therefore AWAY from him.       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>> She saw a man moving across from her right to left, and how was       she to       >>>>>>>>>>>>>> know he'd stop moving?       >>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>> She knew exactly who he was. Stop playing stupid. Idiots       >>>>>>>>>>>>> like you trying to say "she had no idea who he was" yet he       >>>>>>>>>>>>> was wearing a uniform and her bitch wife was running       >>>>>>>>>>>>> around taunting them So that lie is debunked.       >>>>>>>>>>>> The point you missed was that he was MOVING, and if he KEPT       moving, he       >>>>>>>>>>>> would have been out of the way.       >>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>> I was using "man" in the generic sense, not to suggest she didn't       know       >>>>>>>>>>>> he was with ICE.       >>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>> Oh she knew.       >>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>> I know that.       >>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>> I was never trying to deny it.       >>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>> You tried and failed. He was wearing an ICE uniform fer       >>>>>>>>> crissakes.       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>> My POINT at the time was that the driver saw SOMEONE moving to her       left       >>>>>>>> when she was intending to go right. It doesn't matter WHO that       someone was.       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>> It dod to her.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> Nope. Not regarding the question of her intent.       >>>>>       >>>>> Her intent was to agitate ICE agents.       >>>>       >>>> Even if that were true, it's no justification for shooting her or even       >>>> arresting her.       >>>       >>> That intent will be important in court. You just don't get       >>> it do you?       >>       >> What was his intent in stopping when he'd been moving out of the way?       >       > Out of the way of what?              Of the vehicle. As his manual on tactical operations around a vehicle       demanded.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca