home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   can.politics      Libs bitching about what they voted for      997,123 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 996,502 of 997,123   
   Alan to Skeeter   
   Re: Desperation Is, As Desperation Does   
   19 Jan 26 15:09:49   
   
   XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: nuh-uh@nope.com   
      
   On 2026-01-18 16:49, Skeeter wrote:   
   > In article <10kjsq7$3rq66$31@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > uh@nope.com says...   
   >>   
   >> On 2026-01-18 16:04, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>> In article <10kjrtg$3rq66$19@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>   
   >>>> On 2026-01-17 16:04, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>> In article <10kh2io$2tn8q$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> On 2026-01-16 20:31, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>>>> In article <10kf2eh$28hf2$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 19:44, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> In article <10kerg2$268b0$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 18:03, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> In article <10keh5c$23gue$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 14:25, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <10ke30v$1ui33$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-16 04:30, NoBody wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. Authorized Officers/Agents should avoid intentionally and   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unreasonably placing themselves in positions in which they   
   have no   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alternative to using deadly force.'   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He did.  SHE changed that equation.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He chose to remain there when a single step to his right   
   would have   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> taken him out of the danger area.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Laughter!   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I love how you pretend to be an armchair expert on what could   
   or could   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not have been done.  She weaponized her vehicle and he   
   perceived a   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> threat to his life and safety.  Legit shoot.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> If she'd intended to drive into him, she wouldn't have been   
   turning her   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> steering wheel hard to the right...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...and therefore AWAY from him.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> She saw a man moving across from her right to left, and how was   
   she to   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> know he'd stop moving?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> She knew exactly who he was. Stop playing stupid. Idiots   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> like you trying to say "she had no idea who he was" yet he   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> was wearing a uniform and her bitch wife was running   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> around taunting them So that lie is debunked.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> The point you missed was that he was MOVING, and if he KEPT   
   moving, he   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> would have been out of the way.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> I was using "man" in the generic sense, not to suggest she didn't   
   know   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> he was with ICE.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Oh she knew.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> I know that.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> I was never trying to deny it.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> You tried and failed. He was wearing an ICE uniform fer   
   >>>>>>>>> crissakes.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> My POINT at the time was that the driver saw SOMEONE moving to her   
   left   
   >>>>>>>> when she was intending to go right. It doesn't matter WHO that   
   someone was.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> It dod to her.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Nope. Not regarding the question of her intent.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Her intent was to agitate ICE agents.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Even if that were true, it's no justification for shooting her or even   
   >>>> arresting her.   
   >>>   
   >>> That intent will be important in court. You just don't get   
   >>> it do you?   
   >>   
   >> What was his intent in stopping when he'd been moving out of the way?   
   >   
   > Out of the way of what?   
      
   Of the vehicle. As his manual on tactical operations around a vehicle   
   demanded.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca