XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: nuh-uh@nope.com   
      
   On 2026-01-17 16:22, Skeeter wrote:   
   > In article <10kh5an$2tnfv$10@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > uh@nope.com says...   
   >>   
   >> On 2026-01-17 15:13, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>> In article <10kh3gs$2tn8q$10@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>>   
   >>>> On 2026-01-15 16:36, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> It wasn't empty and if you call that a u turn then that   
   >>>>>>>>> explains why Canadians are such bad drivers.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> There was no "crowd" for her to have been aiming at.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Just that one agent.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Not in the direction she was intending to drive off he wasn't.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Why was she turning around in the mddle of the road?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Because she originally intended to go back the way she'd come...   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> She couldn't just go around the block? Oh you're reading   
   >>>>> minds again?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> No. There was clearly an ICE operation going on in front of her and she   
   >>>> wanted to IMMEDIATELY go back the other way to avoid it.   
   >>>   
   >>> Bull, her wife shows they knew where they were and why.   
   >>   
   >> How is that?   
   >   
   > You deny what was in the video.   
      
   What part have I denied?   
      
   >>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> That meant turning around.   
   >>>   
   >>> On a one way street? Are you reading minds again? You know   
   >>> what she was thinking?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Then she realize it was a one way street so she COULDN'T go back that way.   
   >>>   
   >>> She already knew it was a one way street.   
   >>   
   >> Now you're a mindreader!   
   >   
   > If she didn't then she shouldn't be driving.   
      
   So anyone who ever makes a mistake while driving should lose their   
   license, is that your position?   
      
   >>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> ...but realized that she couldn't.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Not on a crowded road. Dumb bitch.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> The PP was alluding to "Other people in her path, you fucking moron."   
   >>>>>>>> ASIDE from that "agent".   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> No one else was in her path.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Exactly!   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> So shut up about it then.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> I'm not the one who made up the bullshit that she need to be shot   
   >>>> because she might encounter someone in the street at some undetermined   
   >>>> time in the future, sunshine.   
   >>>   
   >>> No one did. You made that shit up.   
   >>   
   >> That's precisely what the loser was suggesting:   
   >   
   > Nope.   
      
   Yup.   
      
   >>   
   >> The agent need to shoot her because she might have hit someone else at   
   >> some time in the undetermined future:   
   >   
   > Nope. That's your take.   
      
   That is his literal statement.   
      
   >>   
   >>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> There were no such others for whom the "agent" could have been acting   
   in   
   >>>>>>>> defense.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Just for himself.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Which ended once he was beside the vehicle not in front of it.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> So? He was still doing the right thing. Get over it.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> No. He absolutely was not. By the policies of his agency he was not.   
   >>>   
   >>> Fuck policies. Self defense.   
   >>   
   >> The policy says it isn't self-defense if he could have gotten out of the   
   >> way...   
   >>   
   >   
   > POLICY!   
      
   Yes.   
      
   >   
   >   
   >> ...which he absolutely could have with a single step.   
   >   
   > You weren't there.   
      
   I can see where he was when the vehicle started moving forward.   
      
   That IS in the videos.   
      
   >>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> 6. Recent Surge in Attacks on Law Enforcement (2025)   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> A Department of Homeland Security (DHS) report released in late   
   2025   
   >>>>>>>>>>> highlighted a 1,300% increase in vehicle attacks specifically   
   targeting ICE   
   >>>>>>>>>>> officers.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Homestead, FL (Sept 2024): A driver reversed his car into an ICE   
   officer   
   >>>>>>>>>>> during a traffic stop, nearly crushing him, before ramming   
   multiple vehicles   
   >>>>>>>>>>> to escape.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Chicago, IL (Oct 2024): A suspect rammed CBP vehicles and   
   attempted to flee   
   >>>>>>>>>>> before being stopped by a PIT maneuver.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> This wasn't an "attack". This was a woman in the middle of a 3-point   
   >>>>>>>>>> turn who was startled when a masked man came up and grabbed her   
   door.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> You said it was a U turn? So you really don't know.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> I really do know, because I've watched the videos.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> So was it a U Turn or a 3 point turn? Why was she doing it   
   >>>>>>> there? Why didn't she she drive forward?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> I think it was because she started to turn around to go back the way   
   >>>>>> she'd come, before realizing it was a one way street, and she had to   
   >>>>>> then change back to facing the correct way.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> "you think" therein lies the problem. She should have   
   >>>>> already known it was a one way street.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> People in stressful situations make mistakes.   
   >>>   
   >>> She made it stressful by being there.   
   >>   
   >> She drove up a road and found an ICE operation.   
   >   
   > She knew it was there.   
   >>   
   >> These days, that's stressful for people.   
   >   
   > Not to people who are paid to agitate.   
      
   Oh, you have proof that she was "paid", do you?   
      
   How about just any actual evidence?   
      
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> And still: the "officer" who you claim was hit could have avoided   
   even   
   >>>>>>>>>> the chance of contact by stepping to the right once.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> She could still be alive if she didn't try ti interfere   
   >>>>>>>>> with Federal Law Enforcement.   
   >>>>>>>> There is no evidence that she did so.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Plenty. The video of her bitch wife shows it.   
   >>>>>> The video OF the wife...   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> ...or the video TAKEN by the wife...   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> ...and what does it show?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Intent and the fact that they did know who the agents   
   >>>>> were.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Which has nothing to do with whether she intended to hit the agent...   
   >>>   
   >>> It sure knocks a lot of your lies apart.   
   >>   
   >> What "lies" would those be?   
   >   
   > You have contradicted yourself a bunch in the last couple   
   > days.   
      
   What contradictions would those be?   
      
   >>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> ...because her actions clearly don't match that intent.   
   >>>   
   >>> So the wife didn't know what she was dong?   
   >>   
   >> Explain how it's relevant.   
   >   
   > It prove they knew who the agents were and that they were   
   > there to agitate.   
   >>   
      
   No... ...it really doesn't.   
      
      
   >>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> How does waving a vehicle through square with your claim she was   
   >>>>>> "interfering"?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> You saw the video or did you ignore it?   
   >>>> Answer the question.   
   >> Show me the video you claim shows she was "interfering".   
   >   
   > I never said she was interfering you moron.   
   Your answer implies you did.   
      
   You said "impeding" in another reply.   
      
   Are you retracting them both.   
      
   Oh and here's a hint:   
      
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)